--On Sunday, May 01, 2005 12:46 PM -0700 Tony Bibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what do you mean by 'the first time the list is
instantiated'? I already have the lists so this route
will be slick if I can get it to work.
First time pretty much anything happens with the list.Web access, post,
--On Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:28 PM +0100 Remi Delon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone have any idea as to why Mailman gets stuck trying to send a
message sometimes ? If a resource (DNS, remote mail server, ...) is
unavailable, shouldn't it timeout after a while ?
BAsically with *any*
IS there any pre-built way of getting a list of users disabled for bouncing
for a given list (CLI or web...)? Or am I just going to have to throw
something together using withlist?
TIA!
--
GPG/PGP -- 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E
Received a couple of responses immediately, thanks, sorry for asking what's
probably a stupid question.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
We've now had several instances where for no reason the BounceProcsssor
runner gets totally stuck, uses all the RAM on the machine (1Gig...+1Gig
swap) and gets the machine to a state that makes it completely worthless.
Usually our monitoring pages us soon enough but today apparently verizon
--On Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:16 PM -0500 John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So my main question is - Is there a way to escape the ampersand such that
I can run withlist or arch commands on this list, or do I just have to
use another name? Thanks - John
Use a single quote when referring
--On Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:35 PM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a list of a couple hundred thousand subscribers that I need to
mass subscribe, however the file upload import keeps returning an
internal error. Is there a better way to do this, such as uploading
the lists to the
--On Sunday, March 06, 2005 12:07 AM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fortunately this person wants the list to be completely moderated so
that there will not be back and forth traffice, just outbound. Will
this help matters and make it snappy enough? Oh, I just read the rest
of your message! :)
gmail is and has been having serious delivery delay issues off and on since
it went open/public beta. the problems continue although they are less and
farther in betweenlast few days have been bad again.
--On Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:16 -0500 David Morse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
