Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual host in subscribe url

Mark, Thank you! Excellent answer. You're right that it was formerly cpanel. Just wondering, isn't it a bug that by default virtual hosts Mailman namespaces collide? Why should it be considered normal to require a patch to support virtual hosts properly? In the web pages you referred me to the

[Mailman-Users] virtual host in subscribe url

Configuring Mailman with Postfix and virtual domains. On old sever that someone else set up for me the subscribe path was: http://mydomain.com/mailman/subscribe/announce_mydomain.com On new site I configured it is: http://mydomain.com/mailman/subscribe/announce Is this merely a change acro

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

Stephen, > Are _they_ sympathetic, and genuinely trying to help? Past support at our mailman hosting company (Hostforweb.com) has been sometimes stellar and other times merely passable. Depends which tech fields our call. Last week was the first time I'd encountered a significant attitude prob

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

Mark, Thank you for all the info! > Is your Mailman server in a different time zone? Don't think so. Maybe it has a different cron time. Robin -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

Mark, > I know you > can't see the logs (maybe you can convince the ISP to look), but what > do the notices say? I got 11 messages like this today. All timestamped 7:00 AM: Subject: ScreenplayLab unsubscribe notification From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 7:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

Mark, Thanks for the info! > As you can see, restricting Mailman to 500 messages per hour would not > be satisfactory. Even if you could throttle Mailman to send <500 per > hour, it would only take a small increase to create unrecoverable > backlogs. According to our ISP Hostforweb.com, the mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

Thanks to Dan and Stephen for the help with mailman bounces. I understand the overall issues much better as a result and am working with my ISP to try to track down the MTA problem. I'm still puzzled in some details in how to configure bounce processing. If there's a doc somewhere that explains

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

is mailman doing this? Thank you, Robin Robin Rowe wrote: > After my Mailman list exceeded 500 subscribers I started getting > complaints from subscribers of spurious bounce messages. There's nothing > wrong with their email addresses. I can't seem to turn these annoying >

[Mailman-Users] Bounce message confusion

After my Mailman list exceeded 500 subscribers I started getting complaints from subscribers of spurious bounce messages. There's nothing wrong with their email addresses. I can't seem to turn these annoying bounce messages off in Mailman. What settings should I try? At my ISP the SMTP message

[Mailman-Users] Turning off re-subscription warning

I have a mailman 2.1.5 list that has names being added one at a time by an intern. It isn't convenient to add these addresses as a mass subscribe. They need to be handled one at a time. The problem is mailman generates an unnecessary and alarming "you are being probed" message to the subscriber if

[Mailman-Users] Moving mailman list

If this is in a FAQ somewhere that explains this please just point me to it. I have a mailman list that I want to move to a different ISP. To do a mass subscribe at the new list I can simply use a text list of addresses, but how do I extract that info out of the old mailman list as a text file? T

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

Tom, > At the risk of garnering another "that's not exactly what I asked," a 2.1 > patch was posted to Sourceforge to allow this, a couple of months ago. That's a great answer. Thanks! Robin --- www.LinuxMovies.org www.Film

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

Jon, > > Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman > > spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers? > Let me speak more clearly to you: No. No you can't answer, or no it can't be done? ;-) Thanks anyway! Robin -

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

Alex, > If you automatically reject any email which isn't from list members then > you'll probably find 99.9% of your SPAM go away. Thanks, but I already do that. Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 at 12:00, Robin Rowe wrote: > By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages > with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve > the false positives to go through. I would like to check not just headers > but the messag

[Mailman-Users] spam filtering

By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve the false positives to go through. I would like to check not just headers but the message body. There are a few phrases that would be good to catch ther