Hi Mark
Your patch has worked a treat. Thank you very much for your patience and
generosity. Many of us would be a long way up the proverbial creek if it
weren't for your support.
In summary, for those interested:
Using Mailman 2.1.5 - in the Archives, the URL to attachments was being
malformed
Mark Dale wrote:
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> I have been able to duplicate the problem with the 2.1.5 version of
>> Scrubber.py. I'll try to come up with a simple patch that you can
>> apply to fix it.
>
>That would be brilliant!
It is not clear if you saw my followup post with the patch. It's at
Mark Sapiro wrote:
There is probably some incompatibility between the 2.1.9 Scrubber.py
and the rest of your installation that threw an exception on mail with
attachments. Check Mailman's error log and shunt queue.
Yes, it was a shot in the dark replacing 2.1.5 Srubber with a 2.1.9
There are a
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>I have been able to duplicate the problem with the 2.1.5 version of
>Scrubber.py. I'll try to come up with a simple patch that you can
>apply to fix it. It is fixed in recent Scrubber.py versions.
I think you'd be better off upgrading your Mailman, but if you want to
try a p
Mark Dale wrote:
>I also noticed that with the new Scrubber.py, emails with attachments
>were neither delivered nor archived. Emails without attachments were okay.
There is probably some incompatibility between the 2.1.9 Scrubber.py
and the rest of your installation that threw an exception on ma
Hi Mark
(Apologies for late reply, have been away)
Yes, I sure did. And also rebooted the server (and checked that the
qrunner was starting up on boot)
I also noticed that with the new Scrubber.py, emails with attachments
were neither delivered nor archived. Emails without attachments were okay.
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>> There have been many changes in Scrubber.py (the module which does
>> this) since 2.1.5. I will look into it, but I don't know if I will be
>> able to duplicate the problem.
>
>For what it's worth Mark, I copied a Scrubber.py from a Version 2.19 on
>the wild chance that it mig
On 11/18/2008 06:52 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
Somehow an "=" gets inserted into the URL (see snippet below), and
the links returns "Private archive file not found".
*nod*
If I recall correctly when "quoted=printable" encoding is used, the "="
at the end of the line by its self is an indication to
> There have been many changes in Scrubber.py (the module which does
> this) since 2.1.5. I will look into it, but I don't know if I will be
> able to duplicate the problem.
For what it's worth Mark, I copied a Scrubber.py from a Version 2.19 on
the wild chance that it might do some good - but a
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>In answer to your questions ...
>
>I am using Mailman version: 2.1.5
>
>Subscribers can choose digest if they want.
>
>The link is broken in the digest messages, just like in the archive.
>
>The broken link happens for every PDF file, even though the PDF arrives
>with the email.
Hi Mark
In answer to your questions ...
I am using Mailman version: 2.1.5
Subscribers can choose digest if they want.
The link is broken in the digest messages, just like in the archive.
The broken link happens for every PDF file, even though the PDF arrives
with the email. (Doesn't arrive in
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>In the archives, the URL to attachments is getting mangled.
>
>Somehow an "=" gets inserted into the URL (see snippet below), and the
>links returns "Private archive file not found".
>
>If I remove the "=" from the URL, all is well.
>
>Can anyone shed any light on this, and how
on 11/18/08 6:52 PM, Mark Dale said:
Somehow an "=" gets inserted into the URL (see snippet below), and the
links returns "Private archive file not found".
That's URL-encoded line folding that is not being properly interpreted
by the recipient.
If I remove the "=" from the URL, all is well
Hi All
In the archives, the URL to attachments is getting mangled.
Somehow an "=" gets inserted into the URL (see snippet below), and the
links returns "Private archive file not found".
If I remove the "=" from the URL, all is well.
Can anyone shed any light on this, and how I might correct th
14 matches
Mail list logo
