Scott Race wrote:
Ah, I see what's going on. So for the particular lists were working on, all
messages to the list are held for moderation. So, it seems clicking Accept
will accept the message, even if the message size is too big.
Yes, and further, if the messages are held because the poster
Scott Race wrote:
A few final questions to figure this out:
1. Has this always been the design? The client seems to think that on his
old server the message would get kicked back before hitting the moderation
queue. If so that's cool, just want to make sure I'm not missing something.
I
Hello,
Running mailman 2.1.13 on RHEL5. From what I've read, the max_message_size
setting in a list will be the max size for the message text (body) plus
attachment. Therefore, max_message_size setting of 1000 would be approximately
a megabyte for the message and any attachments.
I've set
Scott Race wrote:
Running mailman 2.1.13 on RHEL5. From what I've read, the max_message_size
setting in a list will be the max size for the message text (body) plus
attachment. Therefore, max_message_size setting of 1000 would be
approximately a megabyte for the message and any attachments.
. Is that possible?
Would adding GLOBAL_PIPELINE directives to mm_cfg.py get that done?
Thanks!
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:22 PM
To: Scott Race; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment size
