On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, J C Lawrence wrote:
> > I believe all of the discussion-list type servers (Mailman, listserv,
> > Mercury, Majordomo, et al) use the same mechanism, so the ISPs that
> > are using this technique for stopping spam will have to address
> > legitimate list servers.
>
> Sadly, nop
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:32:54 -0700
G Armour Van Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that there is a setting for the number sent in a batch, but
> to go from 500 (default, I think) to 1 would be an excruciating hit to
> your performance.
See the FAQ.
The sweet spot is typically in the r
So far, I've dealt with this entirely by getting my server whitelisted
with the ISPs that are doing that. I believe that there is a setting for
the number sent in a batch, but to go from 500 (default, I think) to 1
would be an excruciating hit to your performance. I believe all of the
discussion
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Flavio wrote:
> My mailman mail head have many users in it. Some ISP don´t accept my
> messages. How can I solve it (one message to each user)
This is an MTA issue. Mailman just sends the message to your MTA,
your MTA is responsible for talking to remote MTAs (such as at an
Dear
List
My mailman mail
head have many users in it. Some ISP don´t accept my messages. How can
I solve it (one message to each user)
Thanks
Flávio
