Re: [Mailman-Users] CGI account shouldn't be part of mailman group, but...

2005-07-12 Thread John Dennis
Just to expand a bit on something I should have elaborated: There is exactly one member of the mailman group, the user mailman. When the MTA or web server want to perform a mailman operation it invokes what is called a wrapper. The wrappers are group mailman and are setgid, this means the wrapper

Re: [Mailman-Users] CGI account shouldn't be part of mailman group, but...

2005-07-12 Thread John Dennis
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 17:34 -0400, Poster wrote: > Ok, according to the docs, if the account that runs CGI scripts is a > member of the mailman group, then private archives can be seen by > everyone. This is a bad thing. However, in order for apache to update > files in the mailman paths (like lock

[Mailman-Users] CGI account shouldn't be part of mailman group, but...

2005-07-12 Thread Poster
Ok, according to the docs, if the account that runs CGI scripts is a member of the mailman group, then private archives can be seen by everyone. This is a bad thing. However, in order for apache to update files in the mailman paths (like locks and such), these files have to be writable by the CGI