[Mailman-Users] feedback when users are unsubscribed for bounces

2013-09-17 Thread Perry E. Metzger
Is there any easy way to get the x has unsubscribed messages to distinguish when people are removed due to bounces from when they leave a list of their own accord? -- Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com -- Mailman-Users mailing

Re: [Mailman-Users] feedback when users are unsubscribed for bounces

2013-09-17 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote: On 09/17/2013 09:39 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: Is there any easy way to get the x has unsubscribed messages to distinguish when people are removed due to bounces from when they leave a list of their own accord? If the

Re: [Mailman-Users] feedback when users are unsubscribed for bounces

2013-09-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 09/17/2013 09:39 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: Is there any easy way to get the x has unsubscribed messages to distinguish when people are removed due to bounces from when they leave a list of their own accord? If the time stamp on the message is the time that cron/disabled runs (default

[Mailman-Users] Feedback/ideas on Mailman

2004-12-21 Thread [Admin at dDH]
Hi, I'm not a programmer, but maintain many Mailman lists. We run version 2.0.11 on a Debian server. I'd like to give input somewhere on some problem solutions we've came up with and ideas for problem solving. Right now, confronted with loads of spam to list -admin and owner- addresses, I'd

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feedback on Mailman 2.1

2003-01-26 Thread Jon Carnes
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 00:57, Marc Perkel wrote: Often the programmers and the development team overlook things in upgrading because they don't have the same experience as the end user. I want to point out such a case to you so you can fix 2.1. As a 2.0.11 user I did not need the list

[Mailman-Users] Feedback on Mailman 2.1

2003-01-25 Thread Marc Perkel
Often the programmers and the development team overlook things in upgrading because they don't have the same experience as the end user. I want to point out such a case to you so you can fix 2.1. As a 2.0.11 user I did not need the list mailman and didn't have one. Thus when I upgraded it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feedback?

2002-07-17 Thread Dennis W Heltzel
This sounds a lot like what a weblog server does. A great example of this in action is http://www.slashdot.org. If you have access to a server that can run Zope, you should try a Zope product called Squishdot. I believe it does user feedback really well, though my experience with it is limited.

RE: [Mailman-Users] Feedback?

2002-07-17 Thread Nick Arnett
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis W Heltzel Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:42 AM To: Nick Arnett Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Feedback? This sounds a lot like what a weblog server does. A great example of this in action is http://www.slashdot.org. If you have

[Mailman-Users] Feedback?

2002-07-16 Thread Nick Arnett
Does anyone here know of any message feedback mechanism that can be added to Mailman? I'm looking to add a web-based rating mechanism. Initially, the idea is to let people give others negative feedback points, but the price of doing so is that you received a percentage of a point yourself, thus

[Mailman-Users] Feedback mesasge

2002-04-04 Thread Jason Buscema
Let's try this again... I need to edit the email that Mailman sends back to a user that has unsuccessfully subscribed to a list. I looked in the $MAILMAN/templates/ directory and was unable to locate the file. The email response I am talking about is the following: This is an automated

[Mailman-Users] Feedback needed: nodupes patch and reply-to munging per user

2002-03-11 Thread Marc MERLIN
[I'm Ccing mailman-developers in case a few people there aren't on mailman-users, but please reply on mailman-users] Ben Gertzfield wrote a patch which Barry recently included in mailman-cvs which allows you to not receive the list copy of a message in you were Cced in the headers

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feedback needed: nodupes patch and reply-tomunging per user

2002-03-11 Thread alex wetmore
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Marc MERLIN wrote: The idea was to settle this issue for good by offering, in place of listwide reply-to munging (which would still be an option in mailman, just not one that most people would need anymore): - optional non sending of list posts if you are Cced so