Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-02-02 Thread Gareth Hopkins
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Simon White wrote: SW31-Jan-03 at 14:39, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : SWIs there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same SW domain in one smtp connection. SW SWExample SW SW[EMAIL PROTECTED] SW[EMAIL PROTECTED] SW[EMAIL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-02-02 Thread Gareth Hopkins
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: BAW BAW SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BAW BAWSW Chunking like this means that you're actually sending RCPT TO: BAWSW based on TLD, and then only US TLDs, right? So SMTP_MAX_RCPTS BAWSW set to 50 could mean several different

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-02-01 Thread Simon White
31-Jan-03 at 14:43, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SW Chunking like this means that you're actually sending RCPT TO: SW based on TLD, and then only US TLDs, right? So SMTP_MAX_RCPTS SW set to 50 could mean several

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Simon White
31-Jan-03 at 14:39, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Is there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same domain in one smtp connection. Example [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all be delivered in the same smtp

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Simon White
31-Jan-03 at 18:21, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Simon White wrote: SW31-Jan-03 at 14:39, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : SW Is there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same SW domain in one smtp connection. SW SW Example SW SW

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SW You have a point. Mailman is injecting to the MTA so if it SW does connect/disconnect etc then this will affect even SW Postfix. So, there does need to be a way to have Mailman open SW a single connection to the server for each

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Simon White
31-Jan-03 at 13:00, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : The chunking algorithm for sending messages to the mta is defined by variables such as SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION and SMTP_MAX_RCPTS. The latter specifies the maximum size of the RCPT TO chunks in each handoff to the mta.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SW Chunking like this means that you're actually sending RCPT TO: SW based on TLD, and then only US TLDs, right? So SMTP_MAX_RCPTS SW set to 50 could mean several different second level domains in SW the same chunk, but for every TLD

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Simon White
31-Jan-03 at 16:09, Vivek Khera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : BAW == Barry A Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BAW SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION determines how many chunks it sends BAW down the same socket connection to the mta. Again, a negative number BAW means blast all the chunks down

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting mailman to use the same smtp connectionfor messages sent to the same domain

2003-01-31 Thread Vivek Khera
BAW == Barry A Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BAW SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION determines how many chunks it sends BAW down the same socket connection to the mta. Again, a negative number BAW means blast all the chunks down the same connection. With postfix, this would be ideal. It has