Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Mike Peachey
Mark Sapiro wrote: Mike Peachey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: This is the problem. Exim is piping mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ post listname and it should be piped to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ owner listname. But surely, that would affect a single separate e-mail sent

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Mike Peachey
Mike Peachey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: Mike Peachey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: This is the problem. Exim is piping mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ post listname and it should be piped to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ owner listname. But surely, that would affect a single

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Brad Knowles
Outbound e-mail from Mailman should always bypass any spam filtering stages -- those things should have been done on input and not be necessary to perform a second time. -- Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Mike Peachey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Mike Peachey
Brad Knowles wrote: Outbound e-mail from Mailman should always bypass any spam filtering stages -- those things should have been done on input and not be necessary to perform a second time. Outbound messages are not filtered. Messages to it-owner@ from it-bounces@ are sent from Mailman to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Brad Knowles
Sorry, my assumption was that the outbound service could also directly deliver the mail locally, thus skipping the additional inbound phase. My fault. -- Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Mike Peachey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brad Knowles

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests/ MailmanExim

2007-07-31 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mike Peachey wrote: Mike Peachey wrote: This then suggests that we have two options: 1. Find a way to stop mailman from attaching the held message to a moderator approval request e-mail This is on the ToDo list for Mailman 2.1.10. In the mean time see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-27 Thread Mike Peachey
Mark Sapiro wrote: This is the problem. Exim is piping mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ post listname and it should be piped to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ owner listname. But surely, that would affect a single separate e-mail sent directly to list-owner@ ? If I send to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mike Peachey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: This is the problem. Exim is piping mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ post listname and it should be piped to | /path/to/mail/mailman/ owner listname. But surely, that would affect a single separate e-mail sent directly to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-27 Thread John W. Baxter
On 7/27/07 8:51 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mailman_router should be the first router. Also, you might check your exim-main-log to see how these messages are routed and delivered. The command line command exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED] may provide some insight. The -bt flag

Re: [Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mike Peachey wrote: When a post is received that is held for moderation, an e-mail is sent to list-owner, but when that is sent back into mailman for forwarding, mailman treats the message as if it was going onto the list This is the problem. Exim is piping mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to |

[Mailman-Users] Looping Moderator Approval Requests / MailmanExim

2007-07-26 Thread Mike Peachey
I am having trouble with held posts for the lists I run at Jennic. We've recently set up Mailman to run in conjunction with Exim and it's working very well (withlist -r is invaluable though), but we're having trouble with the moderation because it is ending up in a loop (that thankfully stops