RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-26 Thread Terry Allen
Terry Allen wrote: I was looking into this error tried this command - when I tried check_db it gave no errors - I then added --all which still gave no errors - however, I then added --verbose, which gave the following output - is this necessarily a problem should I worry?

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Terry Allen
File /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 497, in __save os.unlink(fname_last) OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '/usr/local/mailman/lists/mailman/config.pck.last' This error is occurring when Mailman is trying the save the current configuration for the mailman list. It has

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Terry Allen wrote: Thanks Mark, that was pretty much what I thought. I am running OSX 'client' 10.3.8, so it's a stock source installation of Mailman 2.1.5 on Postfix, not anything Apple has modified. Have you any suggestions as to how to prevent this happening in the future. It's the

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Burling
--On February 25, 2005 9:02:09 AM -0800 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can only guess, but the underlying issue seems to be with OSX itself. Possibly you could get a clue from Apple support forums. To which I reply: Any chance that you ran Repair Permissions somewhere in there? And that

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Terry Allen
--On February 25, 2005 9:02:09 AM -0800 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can only guess, but the underlying issue seems to be with OSX itself. Possibly you could get a clue from Apple support forums. To which I reply: Any chance that you ran Repair Permissions somewhere in there? And that

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Terry Allen wrote: I guess the other question I would then ask, is it okay to delete: /usr/local/mailman/lists/mailman/config.pck.last Yes Will Mailman create a new file in place of the old automatically? Yes Although at least one poster in the archives said: The

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Terry Allen
Hi again, I was looking into this error tried this command - when I tried check_db it gave no errors - I then added --all which still gave no errors - however, I then added --verbose, which gave the following output - is this necessarily a problem should I worry? [server:local/mailman/bin]

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Terry Allen wrote: I was looking into this error tried this command - when I tried check_db it gave no errors - I then added --all which still gave no errors - however, I then added --verbose, which gave the following output - is this necessarily a problem should I worry?

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:39 AM +1100 2005-02-26, Terry Allen wrote: Any chance that you ran Repair Permissions somewhere in there? And that that screwed things up? Hi again, No, I have not done a repair permissions for quite some time, owing to it having a habit of screwing up certain permissions I

[Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-24 Thread Terry Allen
Hi again, Just wondered if someone can look at the following for me. Mailman sent the following traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests, line 94, in ? main() File /usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests, line 87, in main

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman error was emailed to user mailman

2005-02-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
Terry Allen wrote: Just wondered if someone can look at the following for me. Mailman sent the following traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests, line 94, in ? main() File /usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests, line 87, in