[Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance Issue

2011-04-04 Thread Champyrivers
Hi, my Task is to evaluate possible Performance Problems with Mailman. Sadly Google does not deliver the required Information, so maybe you can help me. We´re building a new Newsletter System for our University, we send about 5000 Mails to 1000 Subscribers every Day. Can you tell by expirience

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance Issue

2011-04-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 4/4/2011 9:40 AM, Champyrivers wrote: my Task is to evaluate possible Performance Problems with Mailman. Sadly Google does not deliver the required Information, so maybe you can help me. We´re building a new Newsletter System for our University, we send about 5000 Mails to 1000

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance

2009-10-02 Thread Hien HUYNH HUU
Hi all, Now I use mailman with qmail . Everyday I send a message to the maillist , but the server takes 40 minutes to send about 10.000 emails (3-4msg/s) I think It's slow performance, isn't it ? because I hear that qmail can send about 10 millions messages per day. That means It can send

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance

2009-10-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
Hien HUYNH HUU wrote: Hi all, Now I use mailman with qmail . Everyday I send a message to the maillist , but the server takes 40 minutes to send about 10.000 emails (3-4msg/s) I think It's slow performance, isn't it ? because I hear that qmail can send about 10 millions messages per day.

[Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2006-10-19 Thread Blatter, Nicholas
Hello, I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 and Postfix to manage a small (~500) member list and I recently went through and removed everyone from the list, and then added them back in. After doing so I was watching the progress of sending the Welcome message, and noticed that Mailman is taking an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Blatter, Nicholas wrote: Every message is taking almost exactly 80.1 seconds, with no derivation. Postfix's mailq is empty, and all other mail is getting through just fine. Anyone have any suggestions? Why is it taking so long for it to send each message? Because it takes Postfix that long to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2003-09-19 Thread Nigel Metheringham
Anyway, I am looking for some recommended hardware specs to run a list service with approx 500,000 users, with say 2-5 million emails per day. Largest single list is one of the key performance affecting metrics - some of the mailman stuff appears to hit scaling problems on the size of an

[Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2003-09-18 Thread Peter Nixon
Hello List FAQ: 1.15. What is the largest list Mailman can run? http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.015.htp Surely sf.net has much more traffic than the examples listed here as they have over 700,000 users currently... Anyway, I am looking for some recommended hardware

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2003-09-18 Thread Vivek Khera
PN == Peter Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PN I understand all the MTA performance issues, there will be enough PN MTA servers and bandwith to handle the traffic, but my question is PN will mailman handle the load? Is anyone running a mailman How do you make mailman submit a single message to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated. Sendmail has been doing this since 2001. http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES This is old. Check the RELEASE_NOTES for version 8.12.9 (which has a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Jon Carnes
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 06:03, Brad Knowles wrote: At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated. Sendmail has been doing this since 2001. http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES Sigh... You

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:43 AM -0400 2003/07/26, Jon Carnes wrote: Here is the section from the Release Notes that is pertinent to our pissing contest: Add parallel queue runner code. Allows multiple queue runners per work group (one or more queues in a multi-queue environment

[Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread John Smith
With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. John __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JS With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / JS 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible JS with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on in Mailman (which

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:19:57 -0400 Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:19 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Vivek Khera wrote: I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on in Mailman (which will increase the number of messages being pumped through). Also, sending mail tends to be disk-bound if you are not network-bound. In my experience,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 12:19, Vivek Khera wrote: JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JS With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / JS 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible JS with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on your MTA and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix. Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to the end of the queue so that they don't hold up the outflow of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:36, Brad Knowles wrote: At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix. Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to the

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance

2002-02-19 Thread Bodnyk, Bruce W
I'm running mailman on a Compaq 450Mz Pentium II with 512Mb of memory. I started adding users by sending an email to the list-request and the email has about 50 names on it. I'm finding that Mailman is adding at max two people per minute. I'm wondering whether this machine may be too slow to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance

2002-02-19 Thread Morgan Fletcher
Bodnyk, Bruce W [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm running mailman on a Compaq 450Mz Pentium II with 512Mb of memory. I started adding users by sending an email to the list-request and the email has about 50 names on it. I'm finding that Mailman is adding at max two people per minute. I'm

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Performance

2001-12-27 Thread Ganesh HariHaran
Title: Mailman Performance Dear List I have strange problems with mailman. Am using the following tools and respective versions. Apache 1.3.13 sendmail 8.9 mailman 2.0.6 RH 6.1 Python 1.5.2 I have 2 problems: Problem 1: I created 2 lists named forum and response respectively, it was

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Mick
Doesn't surprise me. It's an interpreted language, so loading up the interpreter, then the code, then executing is going to take a certain fixed startup time. It will be completely dwarfed by mail connection time when you start running an actual list. Dave Disser wrote: I just

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2001-02-02 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:04:03 -0800 Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't surprise me. It's an interpreted language, so loading up the interpreter, then the code, then executing is going to take a certain fixed startup time. It will be completely dwarfed by mail connection time when

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2001-02-02 Thread Christopher Lindsey
I just discovered/downloaded/installed mailman yesterday, and am getting horrible performance with it, so I hope this is an easy one. Any mailman operation takes 5 secs; even bin/list_lists takes 7 secs. Is it normal for it to take so long? I use list_lists as an example because I want