Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated. Sendmail has been doing this since 2001. http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES This is old. Check the RELEASE_NOTES for version 8.12.9 (which has a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Jon Carnes
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 06:03, Brad Knowles wrote: At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated. Sendmail has been doing this since 2001. http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES Sigh... You

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:43 AM -0400 2003/07/26, Jon Carnes wrote: Here is the section from the Release Notes that is pertinent to our pissing contest: Add parallel queue runner code. Allows multiple queue runners per work group (one or more queues in a multi-queue environment

[Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread John Smith
With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. John __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JS With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / JS 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible JS with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on in Mailman (which

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:19:57 -0400 Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:19 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Vivek Khera wrote: I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on in Mailman (which will increase the number of messages being pumped through). Also, sending mail tends to be disk-bound if you are not network-bound. In my experience,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 12:19, Vivek Khera wrote: JS == John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JS With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / JS 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible JS with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers. I think it depends on your MTA and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix. Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to the end of the queue so that they don't hold up the outflow of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance / sends per hour

2003-07-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:36, Brad Knowles wrote: At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote: Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix. Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to the