"BiLL" wrote:
>My question is,
>How can I set up mailman to send me an email when there is a
>post held for moderation?
Set General Options / admin_immed_notify to Yes.
--
Mark Sapiro - m...@msapiro.net
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hello,
I am new to this mailman program.
It works very good so far.
It mails to over 900 people with no problems.
My question is,
How can I set up mailman to send me an email when there is a
post held for moderation?
Sometimes I will go for days, and not check the moderation page.
Mailman used t
Patrick Hartman wrote:
>
>I understand that Mailman is a discussion list tool, but was wondering
>if it was possible to use it to send out e-mails from the
>administrator to the subscribers only (without the users
>reply/discussion aspect)? Just wondering if I am barking up the wrong
>tree with Mai
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:23:45 -0600
Patrick Hartman wrote:
> Hi all, I am working with a client who needs to start doing bulk
> e-mail blasts to a opt-in e-mail list. He has Mailman on his site
> already, and since I have not heard of it before tonight I am trying
> to do a little homework on it.
>
Hi all, I am working with a client who needs to start doing bulk
e-mail blasts to a opt-in e-mail list. He has Mailman on his site
already, and since I have not heard of it before tonight I am trying
to do a little homework on it.
I understand that Mailman is a discussion list tool, but was wonder
> "TM" == Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> I must say the term "mailman-user" seems misleading for most
TM> of the postings in that list, which are actually concerned
TM> with development rather than use. However, I suppose that is
TM> not an important matter.
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 08:28:53PM +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > I take the position of one who is "owner" of several lists,
> > but who is not concerned in any way with "system administrator" tasks.
> > If something cannot be done with the program as is,
> > I regard that as an act of God be
Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take the position of one who is "owner" of several lists,
> but who is not concerned in any way with "system administrator" tasks.
> If something cannot be done with the program as is,
> I regard that as an act of God beyond my ken.
In this case the
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:24:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is probably a topic best reserved for mailman-developers.
This seems to me true of many, probably most,of the postings on this list.
As a simple criterion, I would prefer if issues that required one
to alter the existing s
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oops. If the site administrator allows it (via an mm_cfg.py
>> variable), list owners can suppress the RFC 2369 headers.
MM> My bad, thanks for the correction.
/My/ thanks to all you guys who give such good advice and help t
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:21:36PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> Oops. If the site administrator allows it (via an mm_cfg.py
> variable), list owners can suppress the RFC 2369 headers.
My bad, thanks for the correction.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security
> "BW" == Bob Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BW> Too bad. If I wanted to implement this myself in 2.0.10, by
BW> adding a new attribute to mailing lists, is there any way to
BW> cause the new attribute to be added to existing mailing lists?
BW> Or must I rmlist/newlist
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> Nope, site-wide only. Barry already knows that mailman 3 will
MM> probably need a toggle redesign, where most options will be
MM> sitewide, listwide and even per-user where possible
Oops. If the site administrator allows it
> "BW" == Bob Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BW> I hope I'm reading this right; may I infer that these headers
BW> will be supressable on a per-list basis?
Correct.
-Barry
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
At 09:55 AM 5/13/02, Bob Weissman wrote:
>At 09:42 PM 5/12/02, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>>On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:50:44AM -0700, Bob Weissman wrote:
>>> I hope I'm reading this right; may I infer that these headers will be
>>> supressable on a per-list basis?
>>
>>Nope, site-wide only.
>>Barry
At 09:42 PM 5/12/02, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:50:44AM -0700, Bob Weissman wrote:
>> I hope I'm reading this right; may I infer that these headers will be
>> supressable on a per-list basis?
>
>Nope, site-wide only.
>Barry already knows that mailman 3 will probably ne
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:50:44AM -0700, Bob Weissman wrote:
> I hope I'm reading this right; may I infer that these headers will be
> supressable on a per-list basis?
Nope, site-wide only.
Barry already knows that mailman 3 will probably need a toggle redesign,
where most options wi
At 07:35 PM 5/11/02, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> AcLA> On top of that all those damn extra headers that
>AcLA> are added to each email are a total pain. If you (whoever
>AcLA> you are) would make it so that each list could be configured
>AcLA> the way he list master wants rather than f
On Sat, 11 May 2002 22:35:02 -0400
AerosmithFanClub com List Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FAQ has long sicne been read. Perhaps YOU and the programmers should
> read the part where this is OPTIONAL and not something that shoudl be
> FORCED onto people.
You are misunderstanding RFC 2369.
At 07:28 PM 5/11/2002 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
>On Sat, 11 May 2002 21:36:11 -0400 `
>AerosmithFanClub com List Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well damn that sucks.
>
>Mailman is not for you at this point. I recommend finding another
>mailing list solution.
I have no choice in th
> "AcLA" == AerosmithFanClub com List Admin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AcLA> Well damn that sucks. This is one of the areas of
AcLA> this program that whoever wrote it got just a little too
AcLA> anal. It is JUST a mailing list. Heck I ran a list under
AcLA> M
On Sat, 11 May 2002 21:36:11 -0400 `
AerosmithFanClub com List Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well damn that sucks.
Mailman is not for you at this point. I recommend finding another
mailing list solution.
> My suggestion is to make this a LOT simpler and do away with all the
> levels of
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Well damn that sucks. This is one of the areas of this program that
whoever wrote it got just a little too anal. It is JUST a mailing
list. Heck I ran a list under Majordomo for 8 years w/o a single spam
coming across the list and no one getting unsubscribed without them doing
it th
> "AcLA" == AerosmithFanClub com List Admin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AcLA> All I am asking (and asking again) is if there is a way to
AcLA> set up an initial list of subscribers all with the common
AcLA> password?
Now without a bit of Python programming and shell access
Can you just make blank passwords? Never tried it, but
maybe it helps...
-ben
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:22:51AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
> Thanks but this I don't need to go through all that junk just to make it so
> a user does not need to remember a password. The softw
Thanks but this I don't need to go through all that junk just to make it so
a user does not need to remember a password. The software says a subscribe
request that includes a password will use that password for the user. All
I am asking (and asking again) is if there is a way to set up an ini
I have a few questions about MM. Lets start with the whole password thing.
First I like the software but it really is way over kill in the area of
complication. For example the whole idea of passwords for each user is
really (in many cases) totally unnecessary. My users don't want to have to
> Hello. I am setting up mailman and qmail. I have qmail working fine,
> but I am having trouble with mailman - any messages sent to the
> aliases simply disappear, with no description of what the error may
> have been. The only message I have found is in logs/post:
>
> Oct 10 13:58:01 2001 (1
Hello. I am setting up mailman and qmail. I have qmail working fine,
but I am having trouble with mailman - any messages sent to the
aliases simply disappear, with no description of what the error may
have been. The only message I have found is in logs/post:
Oct 10 13:58:01 2001 (13488) post
30 matches
Mail list logo
