On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
cvr == chuq von rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cvr yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue,
cvr too.
Our Exim administrator has installed the filters suggested by Marc
Merlin (thanks Marc). Let's
"cvr" == chuq von rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cvr yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue,
cvr too.
Our Exim administrator has installed the filters suggested by Marc
Merlin (thanks Marc). Let's see if that staunches the flow of spam.
-Barry
chuq von rospach wrote:
On Thursday, March 29, 2001, at 11:41 AM, alex wetmore wrote:
In the past couple of weeks there have been many more messages
complaining about the spam then spam itself...
yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue, too. Which is
another reason to
On Friday, March 30, 2001, at 11:05 AM, Ron Echeverri wrote:
I disagree. Since we can't control spammers, perhaps we should simply
control ourselves, and instead of complaining about the spam, we
should simply delete it. I
If you go home at night and smell gas, do you solve the problem
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:11:58 -0800
chuq von rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2001, at 11:05 AM, Ron Echeverri wrote:
I disagree. Since we can't control spammers, perhaps we should
simply control ourselves, and instead of complaining about the
spam, we should simply
At 03:29 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
Without questioning the boundaries of topic or religion on this one,
there's also the argument that allowing spammers to control and
alter our behaviour, and thereby granting them that power and
influence over us is fundamentally WRONG and that
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:24:30 -0500
reb Phydeaux wrote:
At 03:29 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
Without questioning the boundaries of topic or religion on this
one, there's also the argument that allowing spammers to control
and alter our behaviour, and thereby granting them that
Let's develop the analogy here...
An airport security system can be likened to restricting posts
to list subscribers. Sure, we all have to stand in line and
occasionally empty our pockets before we can get on a plane.
This is a minor inconvenience, but a lot less annoying than
getting
At 05:53 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, Dave Melton wrote:
Let's develop the analogy here...
An airport security system can be likened to restricting posts
to list subscribers. Sure, we all have to stand in line and
occasionally empty our pockets before we can get on a plane.
This is a minor
Title: Advertise It Direct !
When you get me as a... Personal
Trainer
Learning The All About Internet Is Easy
At Your Place ...Or
Mine !
I have an idea, lets all spam the spammers.
Better yet, rebuild your sendmail to use the blackhole list and get these
arses on the black hole list.
Rob
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 3/29/01 12:42 PM, Aleksandra Witkowska at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blackhole list?
When you use m4 to compile sendmail's config file, it has an option to check
the senders domain/ip against a list that is maintained against spammers -
who seem to have discovered the usefulness of this list.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Phydeaux wrote:
The spam is *quite* easy for a human to detect. I hereby volunteer for
duty if called
In the past couple of weeks there have been many more messages
complaining about the spam then spam itself...
alex
On Thursday, March 29, 2001, at 11:41 AM, alex wetmore wrote:
In the past couple of weeks there have been many more messages
complaining about the spam then spam itself...
yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue, too. Which is
another reason to make the spam go away -- because
On 11:03 AM 3/29/01, Phydeaux wrote:
The spam is *quite* easy for a human to detect. I hereby volunteer for
duty if called
jc raises hand
ObAOL
Me to!
/ObAOL
jc
--
Real courtesy requires human effort and understanding.
Never let your machine or your habit send courtesy copies.
15 matches
Mail list logo
