David Andrews writes:
>. Search worked, and users liked it, but I had another
> problem with cPanel, don't even remember what. The cPanel folks said
> they would not give me technical support as long as I used HTDIG,
Condolences. It's not clear to me that that is any of their business
At 11:12 PM 5/25/2022, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 5/25/22 19:32, Mark Dale via Mailman-Users wrote:
That got me Googling for How-to's on integrating MHonArc with
Mailman. There's a fair bit of conversation around this from days
long ago, and a patch for using MHonArc written by Mark S. back in
> > > Before I go down this rabbit hole: was there any particular
> > > reason (back in the day) that Pipermail was favoured (and
> > > implemented) over MHonArc.
> >
> > Mailman was initially implemented by John Viega in the mid 1990s to
> > manage a mailing list for fans of the Dave
Mark Sapiro writes:
> On 5/25/22 19:32, Mark Dale via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > Before I go down this rabbit hole: was there any particular
> > reason (back in the day) that Pipermail was favoured (and
> > implemented) over MHonArc.
>
> Mailman was initially implemented by John Viega in the
On 5/25/22 19:32, Mark Dale via Mailman-Users wrote:
That got me Googling for How-to's on integrating MHonArc with Mailman. There's
a fair bit of conversation around this from days long ago, and a patch for
using MHonArc written by Mark S. back in 2014.
I didn't write that patch. It's from
> Mark Dale via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > And of course, any such "nl2br" equivalent will do exactly the same
> > as wrapping with P tags -- with everything left aligned.
> From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:stephenjturnb...@gmail.com]
> Right.
>
> I'm not sure that we couldn't do better
Mark Dale via Mailman-Users writes:
> And of course, any such "nl2br" equivalent will do exactly the same
> as wrapping with P tags -- with everything left aligned.
Right.
I'm not sure that we couldn't do better nowadays with libraries that
will handle the same DOM that browsers do, but it
>> You might get a better result in these messages by removing the "PRE"
>> tags, and wrapping each line with "...", but that's a real
>> hack, and almost certain to make RFC-conforming email look quite ugly,
>> because every line becomes a paragraph, and you'll lose all
>> indentation. Eg, in
>> I'm looking for a way to wrap lines in archived messages
>> And the lines in that block that seem responsible for the PRE tags are ...
>>
>> lines.insert(0, '')
>> lines.append('')
>>
>> My question is: Can those PRE tags be removed and replaced
