TN == Tom Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TN Look, I completely agree with you about this major gotcha with
TN Mailman, that its otherwise terrifically brilliant coders
TN happen to have some ideological hobbyhorses they ride - there
TN is no use arguing with them about it.
I
At 20:51 -0700 4/8/2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On 4/8/02 6:19 PM, John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can't, if one uses the Mailman installation managed as a service by
someone else. Suitable bribes to that person might help, though. I think
I remember the OP saying that he was
Sorry, I missed this when it first appeared.
John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can patch the installation, if one manages the Mailman installation
and has or develops the skills.
One can't, if one uses the Mailman installation managed as a service by
someone else. Suitable bribes
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually itis the only product that my host offers for mailing lists.
It is a damn good program in all respects other than the programmers
decision to force this on us and wrongfully cite it as following the
standards. The standards make it optional not forced.
At 18:12 -0400 4/8/2002, Tom Neff wrote:
The good news is it's open source, so you can patch your installation as
needed. I was concerned to read you were unable to patch out the List-*:
behavior. What happened when you tried?
One can patch the installation, if one manages the Mailman
On 4/8/02 6:19 PM, John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can't, if one uses the Mailman installation managed as a service by
someone else. Suitable bribes to that person might help, though. I think
I remember the OP saying that he was in the using-a-service camp.
Of course, maybe,
