On 11/14/2017 03:44 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> Mailman 3 sounds very promising.
> Is Postorius and HyperKitty a part of that installation or are we
> talking different software?
Mailman 3 is much more modular than Mailman 2.1 There is a core list
management engine that can run by
On 12/11/17 02:10, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/11/2017 03:58 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
On 12/11/17 00:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Would adding me as a member to the Mailman group be the "safest" option?
It would allow you to do what you need (and to "mess up" Mailman ;)
without giving you
On 11/13/2017 4:03 PM, eminmn wrote:
Anyway, I think there are a few million people around the world who are
aware of his contribution to freedom of computation
And his anti-contributions?
Anyway, since this is rather far removed from mailman v2, can we give it a rest.
z!
On 11/13/2017 06:03 PM, eminmn wrote:
> Steve:
>
> On 11/12/2017 23:37, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Dimitri Maziuk writes:
>>
>> > Heh. You made me look. No, contrary to the popular belief LiGNUx
>> did not
>> > invent the world,
>>
>> There is no such thing as LiGNUx. Stallman may have
Steve:
On 11/12/2017 23:37, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Dimitri Maziuk writes:
> Heh. You made me look. No, contrary to the popular belief LiGNUx did not
> invent the world,
There is no such thing as LiGNUx. Stallman may have his fingers in a
lot of software (to my everlasting annoyance;
https://xkcd.com/927/
On 11/11/2017 2:04 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 2017-11-11 12:22, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Heh, I just looked at that myself. How did such a useless tool ever
become standard?
[snip]
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Dimitri Maziuk writes:
> Heh. You made me look. No, contrary to the popular belief LiGNUx did not
> invent the world,
There is no such thing as LiGNUx. Stallman may have his fingers in a
lot of software (to my everlasting annoyance; he wrote, and at last
check circa 2013 continues to write,
On 2017-11-12 12:06, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
other unix vendors
^^^
braino. "the only unix vendors left standing".
Dima
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman
On 2017-11-11 18:34, Jordan Brown wrote:
arch(1) dates back to at least SunOS 4.0, ca 1987. I haven't been able
to find manual pages before that.
The competitor, "uname -m", dates back at least that far, in the System
V branch of UNIX - it's in the SVID in 1986.
...
So I think the simple
On 2017-11-11 17:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/11/2017 02:28 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
...
The "LISTNAME.mbox/" directory contains a single "LISTNAME.mbox" file
while the "LISTNAME/" directory contains a variety of files and
sub-directories by month. I suppose I have to clean things up
On 11/11/2017 11:04 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 2017-11-11 12:22, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Heh, I just looked at that myself. How did such a useless tool ever
>> become standard?
> My guess is IIRC SunOS was on Solaris 8 by 2001, and it was *the*
> grown-up 64-bit unix: every other unix
On 11/11/2017 03:58 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
> On 12/11/17 00:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Whatever is done, needs to be done by someone with write access to that
>> directory.
>
> Would adding me as a member to the Mailman group be the "safest" option?
> Safest meaning that the web-server
On 12/11/17 00:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/11/2017 02:28 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
unfortunately I'm unable to access that location ("permission denied")
for some reason,
It is not uncommon for /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/ to not be
readable/searchable by other than the web
On 11/11/2017 02:28 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> I also tried to log into the server and believe they're located
> somewhere here: /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/
That's where they should be.
> unfortunately I'm unable to access that location ("permission denied")
> for some
On 07/11/17 19:41, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 11/07/2017 01:29 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
I run a low-volume mailing list (using Mailman 2.1.12) and I see that a
few spam-messages have gotten through, which also means they're archived.
I would like to remove them but all the info I can find
On 2017-11-11 12:22, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Heh, I just looked at that myself. How did such a useless tool ever
become standard?
My guess is IIRC SunOS was on Solaris 8 by 2001, and it was *the*
grown-up 64-bit unix: every other unix vendor's keeled over or was about
to and x86_64 didn't
On 11/11/17 13:17, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Heh. You made me look. No, contrary to the popular belief LiGNUx did not
> invent the world, nor did mailman invent "arch". Sunos had it since
> forever, but it appears nobody else did. Somehow it made its way into
> linux and apparently everyone's
On 2017-11-10 01:06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Dimitri Maziuk writes:
> well, given /bin/arch and its importance to packagers and such, you'd
> have to agree that bin/arch was perhaps not the best choice of name.
> ;)
Yup, and pretty sure Mailman's was first. There's a reason why
Dimitri Maziuk writes:
> well, given /bin/arch and its importance to packagers and such, you'd
> have to agree that bin/arch was perhaps not the best choice of name.
> ;)
Yup, and pretty sure Mailman's was first. There's a reason why
namespaces were invented.
On 11/08/2017 04:19 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 06:00 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> On 11/07/2017 10:41 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>>>
>>> man mmarch
>>
>>
>> Which is apparently some packager's version of Mailman's bin/arch
>
> well, given /bin/arch and its importance to packagers and
On 11/08/2017 06:00 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 10:41 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>>
>> man mmarch
>
>
> Which is apparently some packager's version of Mailman's bin/arch
well, given /bin/arch and its importance to packagers and such, you'd
have to agree that bin/arch was perhaps not
On 11/07/2017 10:41 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 01:29 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
>> I run a low-volume mailing list (using Mailman 2.1.12) and I see that a
>> few spam-messages have gotten through, which also means they're archived.
>> I would like to remove them but all the
Just had to do it today. I chose method #1 - just deleted an URL that was
probably used for phishing from two messages.
https://wiki.list.org/DOC/How%20do%20I%20edit%20the%20archives%20of%20a%20Mailman%20list%3F
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users <
mailman-users@python.org>
On 11/07/2017 01:29 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
> I run a low-volume mailing list (using Mailman 2.1.12) and I see that a
> few spam-messages have gotten through, which also means they're archived.
> I would like to remove them but all the info I can find when searching
> online are along the
I run a low-volume mailing list (using Mailman 2.1.12) and I see that a
few spam-messages have gotten through, which also means they're archived.
I would like to remove them but all the info I can find when searching
online are along the lines of "hard to do", "shouldn't be attempted",
25 matches
Mail list logo
