G. Armour Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're running a number of servers it does get easier, and I suspect that
there are quite a few users here who are in that situation. One system for
Mailman is plenty for my needs, particularly since Mailman has that machine
all to itself, so
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:28:02 +0200
Norbert Bollow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G. Armour Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're running a number of servers it does get easier, and I
suspect that there are quite a few users here who are in that
situation. One system for Mailman is
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:08:00 -0700
G Armour Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But not until you say so!
As with all software upgrades you get to decide when something is ready
for deployment on your systems, nobody else. The criteria you use for
those decisions is private to you and has no
I did it again, reply instead of reply-all. Sorry claw... - AMK4
--
J C Lawrence wrote:
0) That is what the password reminders are for: They remind people that
they are subscribed, and under what address etc.
Therein lies the problem. These people aren't using
G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
At this point, Barry clearly says (on the website) it isn't ready, but he
has legal constraints to worry about, or at least a reputation to protect,
if everyone runs the beta and then problems develop. You only risk one
machine (and its users) at a time.
Surely not
G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
Those groups of multiple recipients are large - several hundred at a time. To make
the change you suggest means multiplying your bandwidth and server requirements by
the average size of your active lists. My most active list has 240 digest
subscribers and 300
