On Friday 04 July 2003 10:51 pm, SysAdmin wrote:
I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
stayed up and running. Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages
get delivered to the lists
Do you have a valid question? Or are you just ranting?
If you have a
S == SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
S recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
S much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
S Majordomo (it has much better documentation,
:S Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
:S recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
:S much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
:S Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.
Is it possible your needs
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman
At 7:51 PM -0700 2003/07/04, SysAdmin wrote:
Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
HAVE NOT tried it but many recommend Lyris.
fwiw
chas
--
powered by Linux, Suse 8.2 Pro + Agent under Wine
I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
stayed up and running. Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages
get delivered to the lists (yes, I've already gone thru the FAQ and
validated that everything is correctly configured, the cronjobs are
running,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least
it stayed up and running.
This is hardly a way to get either sympathy or help.
Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages get
