On 5/14/2012 8:54 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked.
Mark, it's nowhere near as bad as the same type/subject Yahoo
Lists ! ! !
But to be more general, what
Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 03:54:21 schrieb Mark J Bradakis:
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked. But to be more general, what are some of the current
best practices to filter out spam in a
Mark J Bradakis wrote:
But to be more general, what are some of the current
best practices to filter out spam in a postfix mailman environment
on Linux?
I use greylisting with Postgrey and spam/virus/other scanning via
MailScanner.
Also to increase protection against hijacked list member's
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked. But to be more general, what are some of the current
best practices to filter out spam in a postfix mailman environment
on Linux?
mjb.
Mark J Bradakis writes:
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked. But to be more general, what are some of the current
best practices to filter out spam in a postfix mailman environment
Daniel D Jones wrote:
I'd like all posts from non-members discarded and posts from members to be
spam checked and held if they appear to be spam. Is this possible without
hacking the source code?
It is possible by rearranging the global pipeline. This can be done in
mm_cfg.py.
The Default
Mark Sapiro writes:
It is possible by rearranging the global pipeline. This can be done in
mm_cfg.py.
Note that you can also set a pipeline on each list. I do this all the
time because I too share my Mailman with Other People's Lists.
This is done with bin/config_list. One tricky aspect
I've been running a private list for several years with Mailman configured to
reject posts from non-members without any issues. Recently, however, I've
been getting spam with forged headers which purports to be from me. Since I'm
a member of the list, they're allowed through. To deal with
if I want all messages to my list to be discarded and not shown in the pending
moderator requests except for only one email address which I'm using to send to
the list .. how can I do that thru spam filters ??
Thanks ..
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:28:13 +0100, Khalil Abbas khillo...@hotmail.com
wrote:
if I want all messages to my list to be discarded and not shown in the
pending moderator requests except for only one email address which I'm
using to send to the list .. how can I do that thru spam filters ??
I've often found reading the help for all the options in the admin
interface to be helpful.
- discard mails of non-members, regardless whether they match the
filters or not
From the admin interface:
Privacy Options
-- Sender Filters
--generic_nonmember_action : discard
From
Never mind, I just read Mark's post on this subject re editing the
config file. Sorry for the noise
Dan MacNeil wrote:
I've often found reading the help for all the options in the admin
interface to be helpful.
- discard mails of non-members, regardless whether they match the
Bettina Hafter wrote:
We have a list, which discards all non-members. We have 2 filters which
go for spams.
1st filter, if the X-SPAM-header contains xxx, discard it
2nd filter, if the X-SPAM-header contains , set it on hold
now all the spamers which are marked by our spamassin with
hey there
i'v been searching through all archive and FAQ Wizard but could not find
the answer.
We have a list, which discards all non-members. We have 2 filters which
go for spams.
1st filter, if the X-SPAM-header contains xxx, discard it
2nd filter, if the X-SPAM-header contains ,
It did it again
So I got about 4 hours from adding a spam filter before it again
disappears
Is there anyway to check the rpm for the patch for the bug? Because if
it is not there OK, I can chase RH, if it is there then the patch did
not fix the issue/bug.
:/
regards
Steven Jones
Steven Jones wrote:
Is there anyway to check the rpm for the patch for the bug? Because if
it is not there OK, I can chase RH, if it is there then the patch did
not fix the issue/bug.
You said you were running a 2.1.5 version. The fix was first released
in 2.1.6. I believe Red Hat only
Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
maybe the answer to my own question
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1020102group_id=103atid=300103
Can someone confirm if this is the correct fix for my problem?
It may or may not be. There were two different causes to this problem.
The first is
Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
I ended up grabbing the 2.1.8 Privacy.py file and it seems to have fixed
the problem..
Good.
Mark out of interest, that last link you provided me with
gave me a:
An Exception Has Occurred
The root mailman is unknown. If you believe the value is
Hi All,
Ive set my header filters on all my lists (some 40-50 lists) to filter
spam by setting X-Spam-Flag: YES and action it to discard. Now ive
noticed that for some reason these rules' have just disappeared, and
now the spam is comming through to some of the lists... The list is a
public
Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
Hi All,
Ive set my header filters on all my lists (some 40-50 lists) to filter
spam by setting X-Spam-Flag: YES and action it to discard. Now ive
noticed that for some reason these rules' have just disappeared, and
now the spam is comming through to some of the
What are good Spam filters that I can add in Mailman 2.05
In the Hold Posts with Headers opiton?
--
#
Kory Wheatley
Academic Computing Analyst Sr.
Phone 282-3874
#
Everything must point to him.
21 matches
Mail list logo