I, as co-owner of a Mailman 2.1.9 list, received this message:
Subject: Uncaught bounce notification
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted
from it. This mailing list has been
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 08:12 -0500, Barry Finkel wrote:
Or is the format of the text too variable
to be able to parse the OOO message?
Bingo! No Standard, and even if there was one most wouldn't follow it.
The 2 biggest offenders I see are Outlook/Exchange and Lotus Notes, of
which neither
Barry Finkel writes:
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized,
This is the relevant case here. If the message doesn't look like an
MTA bounce, it's probably a bad idea to treat it as a bounce. ML
admin addresses get a fair
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Barry Finkel wrote:
Are there plans for Mailman to be able to intercept out-of-office
replies and ignore them? Or is the format of the text too variable
to be able to parse the OOO message?
I've solved this problem locally using a procmail rule, and I think the
method
