Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-10-06 Thread Manuel Kissoyan
hi! Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded or just like the original attachement file? thank you in advance! At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote: My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download They are

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-10-06 Thread Mark Sapiro
Manuel Kissoyan wrote: Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded or just like the original attachement file? Scrubbed attachments are stored in the directory archives/private/listname/attachments. In most cases, they are just the original attachment (decoded

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-29 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
John == John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be John filtered, if used as is, for URL-unfriendly characters I don't think so. AFAIK, that was fixed about 2000 RFCs ago. When used as URLs, conforming agents will URL-encode them.

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-29 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:29 PM +0900 2005-09-29, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: BradBecause some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely Brad to collide. Can we stop pandering to the broken mailers, please? Are we not hackers? We know how to handle collisions. I don't really care how

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-28 Thread John W. Baxter
On 9/28/05 1:30 AM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know. Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to collide. In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be filtered, if used as is, for URL-unfriendly

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-28 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:50 AM -0700 2005-09-28, John W. Baxter wrote: The hash of Message-Id:, Date:, and Received: (all of the Received: headers) would do, except for the case of an insane MTA--the one generating the top Received: header--feeding the same message into Mailman multiple times. Perhaps a

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Brad == Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brad At 2:03 PM +0900 2005-09-28, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know. Brad Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely Brad to collide. Can we stop pandering

[Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-27 Thread Manuel Kissoyan
Hi, Wondering if someone know the answer of this, made for one of our clients... With the mailman software for mailing lists, it has the option of scrubbing attatchments to the list and converts them to a link for people who are on the list to click on to get the attatchment rather than

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-27 Thread Brad Knowles
At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote: My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download They are saved until some other process comes along to clean them out. and are they

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachements question

2005-09-27 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Brad == Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Im assuming they self delete after a while because clicking on one of the link now indicates its not there. Brad That implies that something else is going on. There Brad is no standard cron job that I know of to clean out