I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on
one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent
said they could look at the message, but would need the original
email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the mta. I can't figure
out where I would
Ted Frohling wrote:
I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on
one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent
said they could look at the message, but would need the original
email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the mta. I can't figure
Ted Frohling t...@frohling.org wrote:
I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on
one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent
said they could look at the message, but would need the original
email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the
Jeff Grossman wrote:
Don't temporary failures get a score of 0.5 while a permanent failure gets
a score of 1.0? So, if that is the case, these temporary failures would
take longer to suspend the account. I think these should be counted.
That's what the documentation says, but in fact, it
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
Don't temporary failures get a score of 0.5 while a permanent failure
gets
a score of 1.0? So, if that is the case, these temporary failures would
take longer to suspend the account. I think these should be counted.
That's what the documentation
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught
by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get
caught by the bounce system?
You send them to me, but I need
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by the bounce system?
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by
*
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by
On 02/14/2009 07:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
That question hinges on whether or not the bounce should be
considered a permanent or a temporary failure. The bounce itself says
This is a permanent error.
Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the
bounce is speaking of
Grant Taylor wrote:
P.S. I find it interesting that the bounce is eluding to the amount of
space remaining in the account. This is (in my experience) extremely
unusual.
As I read the bounce, it says
Sorry, your intended recipient has too much mail stored
in his mailbox.
Your message
On 02/14/2009 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
and I interpret that to mean that even though the user is over quota,
the MTA will accept a 1 KB message to allow you to try to notify
the user of the problem, not that the user is 1 KB below quota.
*nod*
Hopefully there is a limit to how far over
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by the
on 2/14/09 7:32 PM, Grant Taylor said:
Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the
bounce is speaking of is on the SMTP level, thus the sending server
should not try to send this given message again. I think it is a flaw
to extend this SMTP meaning up to actual
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught
by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get
caught by the bounce system?
Here is the bounce. I changed the e-mail address.
kk CHN wrote:
I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator
for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly
with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification
I havn't sent any mails to the address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
still I
kk CHN wrote:
I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator
for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly
with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification
I havn't sent any mails to the address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
still I
On 12/17/07, kk CHN wrote:
I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator
for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly
with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification
In this case, someone sent out spam, claiming to be
On Dec 17, 2007 11:20 AM, Barry Finkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem here where mail from a Mailman list is sent to
a BlackBerry device. When the recipient does a reply-all, one of
the reply recipients is the list -bounce address. This appears to be a
bug in the BlackBerry MUA
Hello everybody ;
I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator
for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly
with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification
I havn't sent any mails to the address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
I, as co-owner of a Mailman 2.1.9 list, received this message:
Subject: Uncaught bounce notification
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted
from it. This mailing list has been
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 08:12 -0500, Barry Finkel wrote:
Or is the format of the text too variable
to be able to parse the OOO message?
Bingo! No Standard, and even if there was one most wouldn't follow it.
The 2 biggest offenders I see are Outlook/Exchange and Lotus Notes, of
which neither
Barry Finkel writes:
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized,
This is the relevant case here. If the message doesn't look like an
MTA bounce, it's probably a bad idea to treat it as a bounce. ML
admin addresses get a fair
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Barry Finkel wrote:
Are there plans for Mailman to be able to intercept out-of-office
replies and ignore them? Or is the format of the text too variable
to be able to parse the OOO message?
I've solved this problem locally using a procmail rule, and I think the
method
Brian Parish wrote:
With *bounce_processing set to Yes on one list I get:
*
The attached message was received as a bounce...
messages, with the same message attached many times. i.e. The Uncaught bounce
notification IS the attached message. These continue streaming out until I
turn off
With *bounce_processing set to Yes on one list I get:
*
The attached message was received as a bounce...
messages, with the same message attached many times. i.e. The Uncaught bounce
notification IS the attached message. These continue streaming out until I
turn off *bounce_processing
Clues
When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent
to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why
this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest
instance, this user also CC'ed the correct list address. It looks like
the message
John Swartzentruber wrote:
When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent
to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why
this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest
instance, this user also CC'ed the correct list
28 matches
Mail list logo
