Re: [Mailman-Users] format

2008-04-04 Thread Con Wieland
res - sequence numbering, and always > putting the prefix first before any Re:. > > Numbering is controlled by litterally including '%d' in > subject_prefix. > The %d is replaced by the message sequence number in the delivered > message. If you include the %d for sequ

Re: [Mailman-Users] format

2008-04-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
sage sequence number in the delivered message. If you include the %d for sequence numbering, the setting for OLD_STYLE_PREFIXING is ignored and the new behavior is implied. In the absence of numbering, OLD_STYLE_PREFIXING controls the order of the prefix and any Re:. Yes implies the previous style, e

Re: [Mailman-Users] format

2008-04-04 Thread Con Wieland
Is it possible to change the "RE" formating on a per list basis. I recently upgraded and I see this was changed in 2.1.6. BTW - I like the new format but it's those darn users-) Changed in 2.1.6 - New feature: subject_prefix can be configured to include a sequence number which is t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format conversion - round 2

2007-07-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Bill Suarez wrote: > >However I am still seeing a problem when a post originates from Hotmail. The >"body" of the message ends up being an attachment and the Mailman inserted >footer (our disclaimer) is all that is in the body of the message. > >Any further guidance here? Is the 'attachment' of M

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format conversion

2007-07-14 Thread Bill Suarez
Thanks Brad, I'll give that a shot. Appreciate the guidance. Bill -Original Message- From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Format conversion On 7/14/07,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format conversion

2007-07-14 Thread Brad Knowles
On 7/14/07, Bill Suarez wrote: > Perhaps I've missed this in the doc's (but I don't think so). The official "List Administration Manual" at is incomplete. It effectively stops at section "2.9 The Archiving Options Category" (URL:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format for multiple add_virtualhost entries

2007-04-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
David Southwell wrote: >What is the correct format for multiple add_virtualhost entries in mm_cfg.py >Single is shown as: > >add_virtualhost('virtualURL', 'virtualmailserver') > >Could someone please give an example for multiples where more than one entry >line is required (prefer one url and mai

Re: [Mailman-Users] format error in qrunner

2006-03-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Stefan Friedel wrote: > File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Bouncer.py", line 131, in registerBounce >time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) >ValueError: day of year out of range > >Obviously a not-so-well-(known/formatted) date specifier is disturbing the >qrunner - any hint? This is a known

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format to enter list of users with names

2005-07-12 Thread John Fleming
> I recently did this successfully while using two different formats. > > In the Mass subscribe GUI, try either... > > > Format 1: > Firstname Lastname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A little observation about this - Spacing doesn't seem to be very important in the syntax above. I am often given a spreads

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format to enter list of users with names

2005-07-12 Thread Mike Flaherty
Hello, I recently did this successfully while using two different formats. In the Mass subscribe GUI, try either... Format 1: Firstname Lastname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Format 2: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Firstname Lastname) See Also (scroll down to "Populate List with Members").. http://web.mit.edu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Format to enter list of users with names

2005-07-12 Thread Jim Tittsler
On Jul 12, 2005, at 21:41, Thomas Waters wrote: > Is there a format to use for a tab sep list so > that the name AND address can be imported via the Mass Subscribe? So > far, I have only been successful doing a Mass Subscribe of email > alone. I believe they need to be space (not tab) separate