On 08/16/2014 08:34 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
Indeed. I can go to the listinfo page, click on the archives for the bad
lists, browse the archives, no problem.
And after doing this is the list's data_version still 98? If so, I
suspect some permissions issue or something like that?
What's
On 08/17/2014 06:45 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 08/16/2014 08:34 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
Indeed. I can go to the listinfo page, click on the archives for the bad
lists, browse the archives, no problem.
And after doing this is the list's data_version still 98? If so, I
suspect some
Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 08/16/2014 08:34 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
Indeed. I can go to the listinfo page, click on the archives for the bad
lists, browse the archives, no problem.
And after doing this is the list's data_version still 98? If so, I suspect some
permissions issue or something
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Can you go to the admin page for the list? If so, does the from_is_list setting
appear there?
Sort of. I get the login page for the list just fine, type in the password then
get the 'hit a bug' page.
Error log shows:
admin(2802): File
On August 17, 2014 11:32:52 AM PDT, Mark J Bradakis m...@bradakis.com wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 08/16/2014 08:34 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
Indeed. I can go to the listinfo page, click on the archives for the
bad
lists, browse the archives, no problem.
And after doing this is the list's
Hi,
What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the provider
has redacted the email address of the party who filed the complaint?
Does Mailman have any built in methods on dealing with this issue?
At the moment we force a custom footer on all messages which includes the
We're now on a new list server, which is running v2.1.18-1. We've set
from_is_list to munged, and it's now sending list messages from the list, and
putting the original sender's address in Reply To as expected.
On my iPad, Reply sends a message back to the original sender, which is what we
Further unwanted Reply All behaviour - a Lotus Notes user says when he sends a
reply with Reply All, the list bounce address is Cc'd. It does include the list
address too, which is good.
Can it cause any problems to Cc the list bounce address?
Peter Shute
-Original Message-
From:
Peter Knowles writes:
What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the
provider has redacted the email address of the party who filed the
complaint?
What do you want to do with this information? Just unsubscribe that
user? I'd say pass the buck back to the provider.
Peter Shute writes:
We're now on a new list server, which is running v2.1.18-1. We've
set from_is_list to munged, and it's now sending list messages from
the list, and putting the original sender's address in Reply To as
expected.
On my iPad, Reply sends a message back to the
Peter Shute writes:
Further unwanted Reply All behaviour - a Lotus Notes user says when
he sends a reply with Reply All, the list bounce address is
Cc'd. It does include the list address too, which is good.
Can it cause any problems to Cc the list bounce address?
Mark is on vacation
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Peter Shute writes:
We're now on a new list server, which is running v2.1.18-1. We've
set from_is_list to munged, and it's now sending list messages from
the list, and putting the original sender's address in Reply To as
expected.
On my iPad,
12 matches
Mail list logo
