On 4/6/2015 10:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's not just the popup windows. It's not just the sites that hijack the
right-click menu. It's not just the autoplay videos. It's not even the
browser crashes! (Mostly Opera, Firefox seems a bit more stable.) Any
one of them
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:50:55AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 4/6/2015 10:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's not just the popup windows. It's not just the sites that hijack the
right-click menu. It's not just the autoplay videos. It's not even the
browser crashes!
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I'm not happy when web sites *demand* that you run their untrusted and
untrustworthy code in your computer before you can see the content.
How do you currently see the HTML content before it is interpreted by
your
I've just send new post to my list and I see that postfix got in and
transfer to mailman script:
cat /var/log/maillog | grep li...@domain.net
Apr 7 15:45:18 host1 postfix/local[32043]: 15439A403A1:
to=list1-domain@domain.com, orig_to=li...@domain.net,
relay=local, delay=0.75,
Logs found in /var/lib/mailman/logs - everything is okay with them.
Wrong anti-spam configuration is also found: I have to put
permit_mynetworks before any reject_... entries.
p.s. Why a solution always comes right after help message was sent to the list?
2015-04-07 16:22 GMT+03:00 Danil
I've been running the modified slice code (three slice servers plus one
backup server) for the past couple years, and generally speaking it has
run perfectly. However every now and then I find that mailman is
suddenly not running on any of the servers, with no helpful information
showing in
6.4.2015, 2:17, David Andrews kirjoitti:
A reminder that any web UI, whether end user, or administrator, needs to
be accessible to disabled persons -- preferably it will use the WCAG 2.0
AA standards.
Have developers of Mailman 3 default web Ui kept this important point in
mind?
Best,
Sorry if I enter now in the thread at an arbitrary point.
Sincerely I'm rather happy with the *current* mailman interface, and in
particular I'm used to it.
Considered that there should be quite a large base of mailman lists
around, that they are unlikely to migrate to a new UI soon, and
Quoting Bill Cole mailmanu-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com:
On 6 Apr 2015, at 20:02, Andrew Stuart wrote:
Sounds like not working with JavaScript is something important to
you. What’s the thinking behind wanting to work without
JavaScript? Isn’t it kinda hard to navigate the modern web
On 6 Apr 2015, at 20:02, Andrew Stuart wrote:
Sounds like not working with JavaScript is something important to you.
What’s the thinking behind wanting to work without JavaScript?
Isn’t it kinda hard to navigate the modern web without JavaScript?
I don't know the original poster's
As someone who raised this issue 15 years ago and was seriously
rebuffed with lots of notes that said essentially this is a mailing
list and not a web forum I then started looking elsewhere.
Anyway, my NGO has put a lot into our web interface for our primarily
email based set of neighborhood
On 04/07/2015 08:09 AM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
I've been running the modified slice code (three slice servers plus one
backup server) for the past couple years, and generally speaking it has
run perfectly. However every now and then I find that mailman is
suddenly not running on any of the
Well that's a shame that there hasn't been any more interest. I have a
file documenting the changes needed, which are pretty simple, so if any
interest is expressed in this thread I'll share the details. It could
be that folks don't know the option exists, but you were a great help to
me
On Apr 07, 2015, at 02:15 PM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
Well that's a shame that there hasn't been any more interest. I have a file
documenting the changes needed, which are pretty simple, so if any interest
is expressed in this thread I'll share the details.
Any chance you could file a bug (tagged
David Andrews writes:
A reminder that any web UI, whether end user, or
administrator, needs to be accessible to disabled
persons -- preferably it will use the WCAG 2.0 AA standards.
We do use industrial-strength web frameworks, mostly Django. To the
extent they support the
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 08:31:04AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I'm not happy when web sites *demand* that you run their untrusted and
untrustworthy code in your computer before you can see the content.
How do you
At 07:26 PM 4/7/2015, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
David Andrews writes:
A reminder that any web UI, whether end user, or
administrator, needs to be accessible to disabled
persons -- preferably it will use the WCAG 2.0 AA standards.
We do use industrial-strength web frameworks, mostly
Not kicking anyone's cat here but if the ADA applies to web sites then NO WEB
PAGE EVER should be allowed to utilize that HORRIBLE 'flat' design strategy.
Pages such as the new ESPN page are EXTREMELY difficult to read and sue for
people who have vision and reading disabilities.
Having said
18 matches
Mail list logo
