Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman throughput

2011-08-15 Thread Brad Knowles
On 08/14/2011 11:24 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote: Brad, I think we are already accomplishing a lot of this minimalism, since the MTA on the Mailman VM is only accepting the message via SMTP, then handing it off to Mailman via the Postfix aliases. The spam and other checks are done before hand, by

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman throughput

2011-08-15 Thread Brad Knowles
On 08/15/2011 02:49 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: You're talking about inbound, and how you have outsourced many of these kinds of checks to other boxes. That's fine as far as it goes, but I was talking about *outbound*, from Mailman to the world of recipients. You are likely to have a certain

Re: [Mailman-Users] Cannot to make work mailman correctly

2011-08-15 Thread James Brown
On 11.08.2011 17:01, Mark Sapiro wrote: On 8/9/2011 11:46 PM, James Brown wrote: I have a vds under Free-BSD-8.1-STABLE which I use for maintaining of public sites and etc. Under that vds I have a mailing system which consits from an exim-4.76 which receives and sends emails to/from local

Re: [Mailman-Users] Are Mailman's files sparse?

2011-08-15 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote: As part of copying our Mailman data from one box to another, I wanted to verify: are any of Mailman's data files, sparse, E.G the .pck files and other files in the data directory? It looks to me like the answer to this is no. Correct. -Barry

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman throughput

2011-08-15 Thread Ivan Fetch
Hi Brad, On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:49 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: On 08/14/2011 11:24 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote: Brad, I think we are already accomplishing a lot of this minimalism, since the MTA on the Mailman VM is only accepting the message via SMTP, then handing it off to Mailman via the Postfix

Re: [Mailman-Users] Cannot to make work mailman correctly

2011-08-15 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 8/15/2011 5:08 AM, James Brown wrote: On 11.08.2011 17:01, Mark Sapiro wrote: For some reason, your 'mailman' router is not meeting all it's conditions and Exim is proceeding to 'localuser'. I found what was wrong in my exim configuration and now I have the next: exim -bt