[Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Neil Anuskiewicz
Hi, I just setup a small mailman list (hosted by Bluehost) for a small organization. I've set Receive your own posts to the list? to yes but i'm still not receiving my own posts. I'm wondering how might go about resolving this issue? Thanks. Neil* *

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: I just setup a small mailman list (hosted by Bluehost) for a small organization. I've set Receive your own posts to the list? to yes but i'm still not receiving my own posts. I'm wondering how might go about resolving this issue? You could try adding your voice to those

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread jdd
Le 11/04/2013 08:23, Mark Sapiro a écrit : You could try adding your voice to those who've already communicated with Google about this, but I suspect they think they're doing the right thing and aren't listening. it's probably possible to open a second gmail account (I know it's sometime

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Carl Zwanzig
Hi, On 4/10/2013 9:15 AM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: I just setup a small mailman list (hosted by Bluehost) for a small organization. I've set Receive your own posts to the list? to yes but i'm still not receiving my own posts. I'm wondering how might go about resolving this issue? Resolve it

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Neil Anuskiewicz
I do have a second gmail just for checking my own posts! The thing is this is an informal list that I setup as a favor for a small organization. A number of the list members have gmail so I'm not concerned about this for me but for the subscribers. I'm the list admin so I want to make the

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Neil Anuskiewicz writes: You guys are saying that I could contact Google and actually have some influence? Have a lot of other people brought up the issue with them? No, that was ironic. A lot of people (including several on this list) have contacted them and asked them to make it

[Mailman-Users] Running an External Command on Subscribe

2013-04-11 Thread Dennis Putnam
Is there a way to have an external command executed when a subscribe request is received (both web and email)? If so, how and how do I pass the requestor's address to it? Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Mailman-Users] accessing relay mailman server from its ownnetwork

2013-04-11 Thread Anne Wainwright
Hello, Mark, This action solved the stated problem but now I note that the same situation pertains in Tend to pending moderator requests where held messages cannot be read or actioned. Also Go to list archives. (we do not have this running). The other two links are fine. I see three more

Re: [Mailman-Users] accessing relay mailman server from its own network

2013-04-11 Thread Anne Wainwright
Mark, hello, Actually there were 5 'absolute=1' entries in admindb.py and changing them all has resolved the issue of pending moderator request, but the list archives remains absolute. Awaiting your official confirmation on which entries to change. Anne On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:25:10PM

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: I do have a second gmail just for checking my own posts! The thing is this is an informal list that I setup as a favor for a small organization. A number of the list members have gmail so I'm not concerned about this for me but for the subscribers. I'm the list admin so I

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread jdd
Le 11/04/2013 17:14, Mark Sapiro a écrit : Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: I do have a second gmail just for checking my own posts! The thing is this is an informal list that I setup as a favor for a small organization. A number of the list members have gmail so I'm not concerned about this for me but

[Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread David Roth
Is there anything open-source to make a Mailman legacy archive searchable? What would be useful is a way for visitors to a website to be able to search the Mailman archives using a keyword and have it display those mail messages. I'm also thinking of having a tag cloud made up of the most commonly

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Joseph Brennan
I think he is saying that his mailing list subscribers subscribed to gmail do not receive a copy of they own mail. fir this we do not have any solution :-) The solution, or workaround I would say, is to change the Message-ID. Possibly, a milter could do this on the way in on the Mailman

[Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
David Roth writes: Is there anything open-source to make a Mailman legacy archive searchable? FreeWAIS (oldie but still goodie), Namazu, and Xapian come to mind. They all require some effort on the part of the user, though. I don't know of anything that you can trivially install (eg, from RPM

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread David Roth
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.orgwrote: David Roth writes: Is there anything open-source to make a Mailman legacy archive searchable? FreeWAIS (oldie but still goodie), Namazu, and Xapian come to mind. They all require some effort on the part of the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread jdd
Le 11/04/2013 18:14, David Roth a écrit : Anyone happen to have a URL to someone doing searchable Mailman archives, just so I could see what others have done as an example? Thanks! if the archive is public, a simple google site:XXX link should do the trick jdd -- http://www.dodin.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 stops sending mail

2013-04-11 Thread Millsap, James
Unfortunately It is difficult as this machine is critical to our operations, I don't have a whole lot of time to troubleshoot, before I must have it up and running. It usually takes around two days for this issue to come up. -TERM will kill it, no need to use --KILL. This is built from source

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
David Roth wrote: Working out-of-the-box is always nice, but I wasn't expecting it entirely. Anyone happen to have a URL to someone doing searchable Mailman archives, just so I could see what others have done as an example? Thanks! See the FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/MoA9. I use ht://dig.

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Joseph Brennan wrote: The solution, or workaround I would say, is to change the Message-ID. Possibly, a milter could do this on the way in on the Mailman host. Maybe add a fixed string to what's already there. However this might have some impact on non Gmail users

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
William Bagwell writes: As long as it defaults off and is user selectable I think this would be a nice feature. No, by definition it's a nasty feature, as it involves nonconformance to RFC 5322. Suggested similar in the past... It will break threading for those of us who want full

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making a Mailman legacy archive searchable?

2013-04-11 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 12, 2013, at 01:06 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: FreeWAIS (oldie but still goodie), Namazu, and Xapian come to mind. They all require some effort on the part of the user, though. I don't know of anything that you can trivially install (eg, from RPM or .deb). Whoosh is technology I'm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Running an External Command on Subscribe

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote: Is there a way to have an external command executed when a subscribe request is received (both web and email)? Not without code modification. -- Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Running an External Command on Subscribe

2013-04-11 Thread Dennis Putnam
Is there some place (log) I can monitor to detect a new subscriber for a particular list? On 4/11/2013 2:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Dennis Putnam wrote: Is there a way to have an external command executed when a subscribe request is received (both web and email)? Not without code

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: No, by definition it's a nasty feature, as it involves nonconformance to RFC 5322. How so? I see two places in section 3.6.4. that suggest otherwise. A message identifier pertains to exactly one version of a particular message;

Re: [Mailman-Users] Running an External Command on Subscribe

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote: Is there some place (log) I can monitor to detect a new subscriber for a particular list? Mailman's 'subscribe' log. -- Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

Re: [Mailman-Users] accessing relay mailman server from itsown network

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Anne Wainwright wrote: Actually there were 5 'absolute=1' entries in admindb.py and changing them all has resolved the issue of pending moderator request, but the list archives remains absolute. Current Mailman has only 4. The change between 2.1.14 and 2.1.15 to add the logout button inserted

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
William Bagwell writes: So if a list adds a footer to the body of a message (many do) then that implies that the Message-ID /should/ be changed. No. As the section you quoted later shows, that is a syntactic difference and clearly *not* a reason for changing the Message-ID. Obviously

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 stops sending mail

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 4/11/2013 9:07 AM, Millsap, James wrote: Unfortunately It is difficult as this machine is critical to our operations, I don't have a whole lot of time to troubleshoot, before I must have it up and running. It usually takes around two days for this issue to come up. -TERM will kill it, no need