ey've searched.
Can someone suggest a search script which will allow me to do this? It
seems to be a real challenge to find something which is up-to-date,
still supported and working well if you don't want to use Google's local
search feature.
Thanks :-)
Hal
--
PS: I just noticed that I've previously replied directly to you, Mark,
instead of the list (pressing "Reply" instead of "Reply list" in my
email program). Sorry about that. This one should reach the list.
On 08/11/2014 04:51, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/07/2014 07:22
On 10/11/2014 09:30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Barry S. Finkel writes:
> On 11/9/2014 8:37 PM, Hal wrote:
> > I did some more research and found out that the MBOX format isn't
> > standardized as there are 4 different variations
Jamie Zawinski's page http:
On 07/11/2014 19:42, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/07/2014 03:52 AM, Hal wrote:
For not allowing text/html
[snip]
But does the above apply to *all* archived postings, or does it only
filter anything that comes in from now on?
It applies to all posts that arrive after you make those settings
On 18/11/2014 17:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/18/2014 06:35 AM, Hal wrote:
So for any new messages from now on I want my list to work this way:
1) HTML formatted postings should be converted to plain text before
reaching other members.
In Mailman's Content filtering msection you wan
On 10/12/2014 20:07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:41 AM, Hal wrote:
Any idea what could be causing list messages not to be archived? My
"Archiving options" seem fine:
archive:yes
archive_private:private
archive_volume_freq.:monthly
Lot's of things.
On 11/12/2014 19:12, Mark Sapiro wrote:
$ ls
total 808
-rw-r--r-- 1 hal mailman 825894 Nov 8 15:39 my_list_name.mbox
And here's the problem.
sudo chmod g+w
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/my_list_name.mbox/my_list_name.mbox
will fix it. Then you can run bin/unshunt which will pu
ho have
non-working addresses after a certain amount of list postings. Could
this be it, or am I right to be worried and should contact the server
owner to ask if an intrusion has shown up on the logs?
Logging into the Mailman admin page for my list tells me I'm usi
On 12/12/2015 23:04, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/12/2015 01:46 PM, Hal wrote:
Today I received 18 unsubscribe notification mesages, each one telling
me that "n...@addr.ess has been removed from my_list_name".
If they were sent at 09:00 server time (that's the default, but it cou
On 13/12/2015 11:14, Hal wrote:
On 12/12/2015 23:04, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/12/2015 01:46 PM, Hal wrote:
Today I received 18 unsubscribe notification mesages, each one telling
me that "n...@addr.ess has been removed from my_list_name".
If they were sent at 09:00 server time (
the administration
interface and clicking on something for every message, or can it be done
simpler/quicker by simply pressing reply to a certain admin message or
something?
Hal
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
htt
st I'm sure this would
mean A LOT of list discussions done outside of the list, which in turn
defeats the purpose of my list (sharing information).
Does this make sense?
Certainly more than a couple of days ago! Thanks for explaining :-)
Hal
--
orwarded to the list moderator?
but I really don't want the messages automatically coming to me; I want the
member of my list to receive it if I click "Accept".
Right now, I also wish this behavior for one list only, not as a default for
all the lists that I have.
Thank you,
Hal Hu
e list only, not as a default for
all the lists that I have.
What file do I need to change to make the default choice be "discard"
on the administrative requests page?
Pointers to documentation gratefully accepted.
Thank you,
Hal Huntley
SRI International
---
#x27; + qsender,
(_('Defer'), _('Accept'), _('Reject'), _('Discard')),
(mm_cfg.DEFER, mm_cfg.APPROVE, mm_cfg.REJECT, mm_cfg.DISCARD),
(0, 0, 0, 1))
### modifying line above to see if default action for "discard" is
### set
I want to modify the look of some of the web pages generated from
list archives--add links to some other parts of my web site, logo,
etc. It looks like Archiver/HyperArch.py controls that. Should I
edit that file, or is there a better way to do it? I am happy to
have all of my changes be
t/date/author
view, or month-by-month browsing. Am I missing something obvious?
Hal
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.
Aha--my installation is still running Mailman 2.0, which apparently
has a far more limited set of templates.
H
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.
various scripts, but it wouldn't work. Mail sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was always silently rejected. Mail sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] worked fine.
My suggestion would be to try setting up an alias for the pager, and
see if you can use the alias to reach the pager.
saw in the FAQ to try "unshunt", but that doesn't seemed to
have unstick the log jam. There are quite a few files in the qfiles/shunt
directory.
Is there a command or a set of procedures that I can run to make the list
start delivering mail again normally?
Hal Huntley
SRI Inte
ing out to have all the list
members in the footer.
Is there a variable that can handle that? Or must the list maintainer just
add the names by hand? He may be content with just names or email
addresses.
Regards,
Hal Huntley
SRI International
---
> Hal Huntley wrote:
>
> >We have a request from a list administrator asking if he can have the all
> >the members of the list listed in the footer of the message. This list is
> >under Mailman 2.1.9.
> >
> >This isn't a "personalization" list
nd I'm willing to do that, but it would
be more beneficial to learn a bit more of the depths of things.
It's mailman 2.1.5.
Hal Huntley
SRI International
-
[Maybe pertinent headers:]
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
Subject: [Mailman] Cron /us
on our system, but one of our users wants to
"upgrade". For mailman 2.1.12 purposes, should I revert to say python 2.7?
Or is 2.1.14 compatible with python 3?
Thanks,
Hal Huntley
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
h
ouldn't be attempted",
"impossible" and so on. Is this correct, or is there a solution?
Perhaps it helps to say that for the past two months (September and
October) each of those only contains one message each, and they're spam.
Other months contain
some
reason. Too much javascript I suspect!
Dave,
I'm sorry you are having difficulty with this page. It isn't ours. It is
part of the Free Software Foundation's web site. They are the ones that
process our donations.
It's apparently working now. At least for m
On 07/11/17 19:41, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 11/07/2017 01:29 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
I run a low-volume mailing list (using Mailman 2.1.12) and I see that a
few spam-messages have gotten through, which also means they're archived.
I would like to remove them but all the info I can
On 12/11/17 00:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/11/2017 02:28 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
unfortunately I'm unable to access that location ("permission denied")
for some reason,
It is not uncommon for /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/ to not be
readable/searchable by oth
On 13/11/17 06:35, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Hal via Mailman-Users writes:
> [The FSF donation page for GNU Mailman is] apparently working now.
> At least for me and using Paypal.
Do you mean you used it with a screen reader for the visually
impaired? If so, what screen reader we
On 12/11/17 02:10, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/11/2017 03:58 PM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
On 12/11/17 00:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Would adding me as a member to the Mailman group be the "safest" option?
It would allow you to do what you need (and to "mess up" Mailman ;
the list's
posting address set for the "reply_to_adress". Since this didn't work
and I tried to read the details/help for the Mailman web-interface but
can't seem to figure this out.
I did change the "reply_goes_to_list" setting to "Explicit address
On 20/01/18 20:05, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 01/20/2018 10:18 AM, Hal via Mailman-Users wrote:
I'm a little confused about the "reply-to" setting as I was pretty sure
I had set my list up so that all replies by default go back to the list,
but for some reason a reply goes directl
will go to the mailing list.
That's my experience anyway (I use Thunderbird 52.5.2 Mac).
Hal
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x
33 matches
Mail list logo
