Hello everyone,
On our list server, one can find messages from the administrator in the
exim log:
whitman:/var/log/exim4# grep 1DB3Xc-0005bz-1W mainlog
2005-03-14 23:20:25 1DB3Xc-0005bz-1W = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=adsl-67-122-237-50.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net (capcsac.org)
[67.122.237.50] P=esmtp
list server usage surveys online, but most of them have 30,000
and above as their largest class of addresses.
Thanks for the help!
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 05:40:31PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
The server has four lists of about 200,000 recipients each. They are
announce-only subscription lists that receive an occasional post.
Despite being low traffic, we have some consistency issues.
Another question. Most
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:26:50PM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:40 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
I've got some questions on a mailman server that's currently
performing non-optimally.
If you've got a large list, the first thing you need to do is to
search the FAQ
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:23:12AM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:46 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
One propety of these lists is that there is a high incidence of bad
addresses - the developer of the web front end refuses to do any kind
of validation before they are added
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:39:37AM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:01 AM -0500 2005-12-22, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Ahh. In this case you might want to give me some identifying
information for your lists, because I updated FAQ 1.15 with the
information you had posted on the list, and I