> I still do not have Postorius or Hyperkitty installed. My use case is
> a PHP-based CMS which administers Mailman 3 Core via its REST API. I
> wrote a quick and dirty PHP client and it works surprisingly well.
> Mailman 3 Core has been solid in production and easy to deal with via
&g
I took another look at installing Mailman 3, and ended up lost and
confused. I'm an experienced software person - but my Python knowledge
is minimal.
Fedora 25, python 3.5.3, pretty much out of the box.
Mailman version: 3.1.0 (The other bits and pieces are current - 1.1)
I tried to follow the
On 22-Sep-17 16:50, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> At Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:57:36 +0200 lusche...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>> [Snip]
>>> , but every now and then some people
>>> complain about something. The most annoying thing is that messages are
>>> processed but then queued for up to one hour
On 02-Oct-17 15:35, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Oh, I agree: mailman worked exactly as designed. Whoever designed that
> particular assumed it'll take zero time to process an uploaded list of
> an unknown size, and that did precisely what ass-u-me always does. No
> surprises there, unfortunately.
No,
On 05-Sep-17 10:55, Ian Kelling wrote:
> There is at least one very major mail provider where
> joe+any_string@domain goes to the inbox of joe by default, allowing bad
> people to get my mailman instance to send many subscription mails to
> joe+random_string@domain, messing up joe's inbox, because
SpamAssassin:
Don't match X-Spam-Score unless you are extracting the value and doing
computation. Note that the value isn't necessarily numeric - e.g.
'undef - 10.0.0.23 is whitelisted' is a valid value, as are '-1.6 (-)',
'0.70 () [Tag at 5.00] COMBINED_FROM,SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT,SPF(pass,0)' and
On 17-Aug-17 16:47, Andy Cravens wrote:
>
>
> David,
>
> I forgot to mention I’m also working on a modsecurity rule to look at all
> POSTs
> and reject if they contain an email address with a + sign.
>
I understand the drive to suppress an attack. However, + is valid in
e-mail addresses. It's
On 10-Dec-17 19:24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> Note that with this specific issue, I could expose a list's web_page_url
> in the web admin UI, but that wouldn't solve the problem. As Brian
> indicates, making Mailman use https involve more than that. It also
> requires certificates and web server
On 09-Dec-17 14:06, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 12/09/2017 10:40 AM, Chip Davis wrote:
>> That's all well and good Mark, but surely you know that any fix that
>> involves issuing a shell command is useless for those of us responsible
>> for lists on a shared server running cPanel (or equivalent).
>
>
On 24-May-18 17:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> who just now wants extra analytics from Mailman, real bad timing !
> GDPR law hits Europe in 1 hour if CET or 2 maybe in BST, &
> Many people in major through tiny companies & orgs (way beyond
> a few of us Mailman admins) are freaking about that, &
On 08/01/2018 09:43 AM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
> And I tried my program on the Bluehost version and I was greeted with
>
> Not Acceptable!Not
> Acceptable!An appropriate representation of the requested
> resource could not be found on this server. This error was generated by
> Mod_Security.<
On 17-Apr-18 10:28, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> The idea for this comes from some of the web sites that perform this;
> unfortunately most of them are "upgrading" from simple, fast, easy
> checks to bloated ones that use a ton of Javascript, can't be scripted,
> and are increasingly behind
On 16-Apr-18 07:38, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:08:43AM +0200, mailman-admin wrote:
>> Brute Force attempts can only be mitigated by e.g. fail2ban.
> Nope. There are other ways.
>
> Brute force attacks can be pre-emptively blocked by nearly everyone
> operating a Mailman
On 19-Apr-18 02:46, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> So here's my problem. A lot of my constituency resides in CN,
> occasionally including people at frequently problematic domains like
> 163.com. Do you know any resources (or keywords to start googling
> even!) at subnational levels? KR and CN
On 19-Apr-18 23:33, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> tlhackque via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > I'm not sure what you are looking for.
>
> I'm looking for anything that will help block swaths of Chinese
> spammers and possibly attacks, while allowing me to do a better job
On 31-Jan-19 05:11, R. Diez wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I have the following recurring problem with mailing lists all over the
> Internet: people do reply to my posts, by they do not address or copy
> me in their replies. They send their e-mails only to the mailing list.
> Or they reply to the previous
>From /usr/lib/mailman/cron/senddigests, I'm seeing this - which is the
result of an annoying webbug URL in some (actually important) inbound
messages.
I guess one approach would be for the filename name to be simply the
sha-xxx of the generated name...not being a Python person, what's the
best
17 matches
Mail list logo
