At Wed, 2002-02-20 12:32:06 -0800 John W Baxter wrote:
At 2002-02-20 13:16 -0500, Paul-Catalin Oros wrote:
Implicitly approved people. I just tested this and it works fine.
Implicitly approved people (addresses) can be forged. Easily.
Over on the developer list, I recently suggested
At 2002-02-20 13:16:37 -0500 Paul-Catalin Oros wrote:
On Wed, 2002-02-20, Marcel Hicking wrote:
I'd like to have a moderated (here: announcements only)
list where I have an additional admin (moderator) who
would be allowed nothing but approve or reject postings
(which usually would be only
At 2002-02-14 09:43:54 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, 2002 Feb 13 at 15:04:25 -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
How can I change the list password when I forgot (actually never knew)
This, too, is answered in the FAQ.
No, the FAQ URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/faq.html does
not
Sun, 2002-02-03 09:37:51 +0100 Matthias Jaenichen wrote:
even if you use TEXT, but have nonstandard chars in the text/subject like
äöü the archives become unreadable.
I think the problem here is that the format it is stored in the archives is
the only transportable one. If we strip html,
Fri, 2002-01-25 19:03:53 -0500 David Pierron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I installed Mailman 2.0.8 and have noticed that it doesn't put the list
footer on messages in HTML format...
I looked on SourceForge to see if the bug was posted and a possible
resolution, but didn't see anything in Bugs or
At 2002-01-08 11:39:27 -0500 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Tue, 2002 Jan 08 at 00:02:58 -0800, jgo wrote:
Anyone know of likely things that could be going wrong, here?
By default, sendmail on OS X doesn't use the alias file (it uses NetInfo).
Either modify your sendmail.cf file to use the alias
There have been a number of questions on this... and answers, but
I don't quite see an answer that works... yet.
I'm getting the dreaded smrsh error.
smrsh: wrapper not available for sendmail programs
554 5.0.0 |/Users/mailman/Documents/mailman/bin/mail/wrapper post
third... Service unavailable
Kevin Brouelette 2001-12-27 18:28:50 -0800 wrote:
Drama Share wrote:
Can you tell me if, (and if so where), a subscriber can be blocked,
other than through just using the moderate features.
If you are using Sendmail you may block them before they
even get handed off to mailman.
I'll give
OK I was experience the black hole effect with postings to the list;
now I'm getting bounces. /etc/aliases looks like this
mailman: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailman-owner: mailman
## listname mailing list
## created: 2001-11-21 mailman
listname:
|/Users/mailman/Documents/mailman/bin/mail/wrapper post
FOund out what it is.
Please make sure your relaying is enabled for your
localhost.localdomain. and also make sure your relaying
is enabled for 127.0.0.1
Check it out in the /etc/mail/access file
Don't have one of those. What creates it? Is it only
used by a particular MTA? (Gotta dig
Peter Jay Salzman at 2001-11-21 09:03:02 -0800 wrote:
1. user subscribes to list
2. user gets confirmation notice
3. user replies to confirmation notice
4. i get no email that there's a pending request waiting for me
the only way to learn of the pending request is to visit the admin page.
sure, just send mail to listname[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the subject subscribe sans the quotes
And does the sysadmin have to have set up a username
listname-request
for this to work? Otherwise, wouldn't it just get
rejected with user not found or some such?
[Taking great glee in adding
Jon Carnes wrote:
2001-10-31 10:17:00 -0800 J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 2001-10-31 11:31:24 -0500 Joshua S Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the assumtion that the lists will be found off the home
directory in lists/.
http://www.mysql.org/mailman/listinfo/ I have four lists
Detlef Neubauer 2001-10-19 16:28:51 +0200 wrote:
Clean Air wrote:
Is there a way to mass-UNsubscribe users from the system?
I handle at least 50 unsubscribe requests a week, and
it's not fun to do it one at a time.
~/bin/remove_members
But why should one need to handle so many manually;
I really don't think RFTM is rude -- it's reality.
If more people did it there'd definitely be less general
confusion and that's, in fact, what the docs are for
-- issues such as this.
Yah, the trick these days is figuring out which manual.
With mailman, we have mailman itself, python,
Thanks to Joe, Greg David. Changing the name of the
python executable back from the recommended python.exe
to python let the mailman installation checks work.
(Sorry for the double post; a bounce message made me
think it hadn't gotten posted the first time.)
Now, I'm looking at security
I'm trying to install on OS X (10.1) and am getting
a complaint about python not existing... but...
./configure --prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents --exec-
prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents/bin --with-var-
prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents/mutable --with-
python=/usr/local/bin/python.exe
Compiling
17 matches
Mail list logo
