Hi,
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:00, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>
>>I've tested with my 1.3.29 installation and verified apache PATH_INFO
>>does convert '//' to '/'. Barry also wanted to clarify which apache
>>version/installation (combination with mailman) is valnerable. Return
At 5:12 PM -0500 2005-02-14, Barry Warsaw wrote:
In response to this issue, FAQ 1.27 has been updated
Wow Brad, I was just about to change this to read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but you beat me to it by seconds. :)
Mark had clued me in that someone had changed the
security-related pages at www.list.o
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 10:23, Brad Knowles wrote:
> In response to this issue, FAQ 1.27 has been updated
Wow Brad, I was just about to change this to read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but you beat me to it by seconds. :)
> , and the
> mailman-users and mailman-developers mailing lists have likewise b
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:00, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> I've tested with my 1.3.29 installation and verified apache PATH_INFO
> does convert '//' to '/'. Barry also wanted to clarify which apache
> version/installation (combination with mailman) is valnerable. Return
> code of 200 doesn't mean suce
