Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-31 Thread Brad Knowles
Of course, the current version is 2.1.9, and, IIRC the reason we quickly moved up to that version was a security hole. And 2.1.10 is pretty close to release. -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent from my iPhone On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:42 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wittygal: Finally one I CAN assist with -:) ! I am 1 of their FIRST premium account and what you need is a Level 3 Tech and Stephen Trelz has been the one who assisted me. You also HAVE to ask to have you outgoing usage opened up from 50/hr (SOP) to 500/hr. It's the little things their FAQs

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
wittygal wrote: >Thanks for the info. I am going to try to get back with them with regard to >this and point them to the url in question for the faqs. Does anyone have a >problem with me copying select portions of your emails on this subject? Please feel free to quote anything I've posted in thi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Yan Herndon
the Number of Subscribers for eachlist? Larry Stone sent the message below at 14:09 8/29/2007: >On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Dragon wrote: > > > Lots of us have done just that. I run my lists on a server owned by a > > friend and have pretty much free reign to do whatever I want. > &

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Dragon
Larry Stone sent the message below at 14:09 8/29/2007: >On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Dragon wrote: > > > Lots of us have done just that. I run my lists on a server owned by a > > friend and have pretty much free reign to do whatever I want. > > > If you can justify the costs of doing so, it is a good solut

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Brad Knowles
On 8/29/07, Brian Luria wrote: > So, a thought I had - is it a 'crazy' idea to set up my own webserver > and install mailman on it? Or is that a bit too much. That is not a crazy idea. In fact, if you did that, you would be installing and using Mailman in the manner for which it was actually

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Larry Stone
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Dragon wrote: > Lots of us have done just that. I run my lists on a server owned by a > friend and have pretty much free reign to do whatever I want. > If you can justify the costs of doing so, it is a good solution. For > people like me who do this both as a hobby and for a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Dragon
Brian Luria wrote: >I am actually using bluehost as well (recently started) >Haven't reached a limit for now - I was having major delays with messages >being sent - found out it was b/c I was sharing a server with mulitple other >users so we would all be in 'que' waiting for a msg to be sent. > >So

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Brandon Sussman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 wittygal wrote: > Well, it seemed like a load of bull. Then they suggested I find a special > email list provider. Is there such a thing? > > And how would I find it. You see I am doing this as a charity thing for > about 5 online email groups for deb

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Brian Luria
I am actually using bluehost as well (recently started) Haven't reached a limit for now - I was having major delays with messages being sent - found out it was b/c I was sharing a server with mulitple other users so we would all be in 'que' waiting for a msg to be sent. So, a thought I had - is it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Brad Knowles
On 8/29/07, wittygal wrote: > Well, it seemed like a load of bull. Then they suggested I find a special > email list provider. Is there such a thing? Sure. Some Mailman-specific hosting groups are listed in FAQ 1.17 at , a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Brian Carpenter
August 29, 2007 12:24 PM To: 'Mark Sapiro' Cc: mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist? Well, it seemed like a load of bull. Then they suggested I find a special email list provider. Is there such a thing? And how would I find it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread wittygal
? -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:29 AM To: Brad Knowles; wittygal; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist? Brad Knowles wrote: >On 8/29/07, wittygal wr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: >On 8/29/07, wittygal wrote: > >>They tell me that >> phplist doesn't have the problems mailman does. > >That's a total load of bull. Agreed. First, phplist only does one-way (announcement) lists so if you want a discu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Limit to the Number of Subscribers for eachlist?

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
Larry Stone wrote: >On 8/29/07 2:52 AM, wittygal at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Blue host support tells me that mailman only supports up to 150 >> subscribers per list. Is this true? > >No. There are people running mailman with thousands of people on a list. I >think there is some information o