On 08/14/2011 11:24 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
Brad, I think we are already accomplishing a lot of this minimalism,
since the MTA on the Mailman VM is only accepting the message via SMTP,
then handing it off to Mailman via the Postfix aliases. The spam and
other checks are done before hand, by
On 08/15/2011 02:49 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
You're talking about inbound, and how you have outsourced many of these
kinds of checks to other boxes. That's fine as far as it goes, but I was
talking about *outbound*, from Mailman to the world of recipients.
You are likely to have a certain
Hi Brad,
On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:49 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
On 08/14/2011 11:24 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
Brad, I think we are already accomplishing a lot of this minimalism,
since the MTA on the Mailman VM is only accepting the message via SMTP,
then handing it off to Mailman via the Postfix
Hello,
I am trying to gage the capability of a Mailman virtual machine, which we will
be moving our lists to. I'd like to do my best to size and tune this VM, and
it's Postfix and Mailman installation, before putting it in production, and
potentially having to troubleshoot and tune in a hurry.
Ivan Fetch wrote:
What is a reasonable / realistic way to benchmark a Mailman installation? Are
there details of other similarly sized instlalations and throughput numbers
which I can compare?
I don't have any data for a comparable size installation. The benchmark
test you describe seems
Hello,
THanks Mark, I appreciate this. MOre below:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It seems the major hurdle is in processing the 'out' queue. It is
possible to slice OutgoingRunner to provide some parallelism in this
process and that may speed things up, but I suspect that
On 8/14/2011 1:39 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It seems the major hurdle is in processing the 'out' queue. It is
possible to slice OutgoingRunner to provide some parallelism in this
process and that may speed things up, but I suspect that a lot of
Hello,
On Aug 14, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
No. Threaded delivery in SMTPDirect.py was an experimental feature in
Mailman 2.0. It was never implemented for Mailman 2.1 although the
setting and its documentation were not removed from Defaults.py. Setting
this in mm_cfg.py has no
On 8/14/2011 4:25 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
I noticed that the incoming qrunner was using 10% CPU (according to the pcpu
column of ps) even after qfiles/in was empty, and after all 5000 messages
were processed. I wonder what the incoming runner is doing - any ideas there?
If I am not
On 08/14/2011 03:39 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
There are some MTA tuning tips in the FAQ
http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3, but some are only applicable to Mailman
2.0 so be careful.
The majority of the MTA tuning tips that I know of should be applicable
to most any mailing list manager, since they are
Hi Brad,
On Aug 14, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
The majority of the MTA tuning tips that I know of should be applicable
to most any mailing list manager, since they are oriented towards
helping the MTA better deal with large amounts of outgoing mail, and
optimizing certain types
11 matches
Mail list logo
