On 2018-02-06 04:09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Do you have something to add to that, or disagree with that?
I said it was what *I* believe, not what IETF believes.
Dima
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
Dimitri Maziuk writes:
> Heh. I personally believe that a message sent by a mailing list
> *must* have the mailing list as the originator: dkim, id, and
> whatever else.
First, please be careful with terminology. *Originator* is
well-defined (RFC 5598) as the agent of the Author that first
Mark Sapiro writes:
> On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >
> > According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be
> > present and MUST be unique.
>
> Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I
> recently looked it up in RFC 5322 and
On 02/05/2018 11:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>
>> According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be
>> present and MUST be unique.
>
> Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I
> recently looked it up in
On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be
> present and MUST be unique.
Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I
recently looked it up in RFC 5322 and predecessors (see
