At 5:38 PM -0700 2004-08-21, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
You may think my ISP's spamware is stupid and for all I know you may be
right.
Auto-whitelist management systems (such as TMDA) are greatly
despised amongst much of the Internet community. I don't know if
your ISP is using this partic
At 12:31 AM -0400 2004-08-21, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
Thank you for your clarification. I had no idea - why would I? - that
signing up for a mailing list would generate all these individual
e-mails coming in from people, as opposed emails coming from the list
itself. Had I known that -
At 12:55 AM -0400 2004-08-21, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
You really expect ordinary users, who sign up for a discussion list
to understand autoresponders, mandatory white lists, etc???
If they're going to use these tools, they need to understand
something about how to configure them properly
At 12:50 AM -0400 2004-08-21, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
It is also the intuitive thing to do and is also the common practice with
most list management services.
Oh? How many decades have you been doing this? How many decades
have you been administering such services?
You can't make an a
up for a daily digest form, mailed firectly from
the list and not all this "crap" - as you call it.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Aug 20, 2004 4:17 PM
To: Charles Mikecz Vamossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
It is also the intuitive thing to do and is also the common practice
with most list management services. I write to a list - I expect my
responses come from the list, especially if I sign up for a daily
digest. Instead I am bombarded by hostile individual response
At 02:22 PM 8/20/2004 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jeff Barger wrote:
>
>On Aug 20, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Richard Barrett wrote:
>
>> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
>> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
>> solicited from the list's subscr
At 04:17 PM 8/20/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 15:22, Richard Barrett wrote:
> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
> solicited from the list's subscribers.
Well, if they only want to r
At 04:36 PM 8/20/2004 -0400, Jeff Barger wrote:
On Aug 20, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Richard Barrett wrote:
Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
having some crap software intercepting the responses they have solicited
from the list's subscribers.
Nope, I expect that's a
]>
Sent: Aug 20, 2004 4:17 PM
To: Charles Mikecz Vamossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] New user - Mailman question
On 20 Aug 2004, at 20:39, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
> HI, I am a new member of the list and a list administrator responsible
ng to this list and then
having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
solicited from the list's subscribers.
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 20 August 2004 21:17:52 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [Mailman-Users] New user - Mailman question
R
At 02:22 PM 8/20/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Jeff Barger wrote:
>
>On Aug 20, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Richard Barrett wrote:
>
>> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
>> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
>> solicited from the list's subscribers.
>
On Aug 20, 2004, at 5:32 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
David Blomquist wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 15:22, Richard Barrett wrote:
Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and
then
having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
solicited from the list's subscribers.
We
David Blomquist wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 15:22, Richard Barrett wrote:
>> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
>> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
>> solicited from the list's subscribers.
>
>Well, if they only want to receiv
Jeff Barger wrote:
>
>On Aug 20, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Richard Barrett wrote:
>
>> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
>> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
>> solicited from the list's subscribers.
>
>Nope, I expect that's a pretty crowd
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 15:22, Richard Barrett wrote:
> Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
> having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
> solicited from the list's subscribers.
Well, if they only want to receive messages from the list itsel
On Aug 20, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Richard Barrett wrote:
Am I alone in taking exception to people posting to this list and then
having some crap software intercepting the responses they have
solicited from the list's subscribers.
Nope, I expect that's a pretty crowded room :)
-Jeff
---
e: Re: [Mailman-Users] New user - Mailman question
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an automatic reply to your email message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email address is protected by EarthLink spamBlocker. Your email
message has been redirected to a "suspect email" folder for
[EMAI
On 20 Aug 2004, at 20:39, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
HI, I am a new member of the list and a list administrator responsible
for two lists. Frankly I am struggling with some of the features and
functions and I thought I would ask "my elders" for some guidance.
Our lists are very simple: we di
On Aug 20, 2004, at 3:39 PM, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
The problem is that non-members have apparently written postings and
we, laboring under the impression that if we do nothing, their letters
will get deleted, did in fact do nothing - and the letters appeared on
the list. Apparently, we
HI, I am a new member of the list and a list administrator responsible for
two lists. Frankly I am struggling with some of the features and functions
and I thought I would ask "my elders" for some guidance.
Our lists are very simple: we distribute weekly information to members
about our organi
21 matches
Mail list logo
