Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-22 Thread Ian A B Eiloart
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:31 am +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 10:09 AM +0100 2004-07-22, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy everything between the ---snip--- lines, including the blank lines, but NOT t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-22 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:09 AM +0100 2004-07-22, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy everything between the ---snip--- lines, including the blank lines, but NOT the snip lines themselves. The problem with telling people to copy something exactly is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-22 Thread Ian A B Eiloart
--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:22 am +0200 Ronny Raschkowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. Could you provid me an exact dummy mail how it would look? I fear i'd do sth wrong., so i would like to see an example. I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy every

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ronny Raschkowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark Sapiro wrote: > >>Ronny Raschkowan wrote: >> >> >>>This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. >>> >>> >>> >> >>If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the >>old numbers, you could always add 3633

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Ronny Raschkowan
Mark Sapiro wrote: Ronny Raschkowan wrote: This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning of the .mbox file and then bin/arch --wip

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ronny Raschkowan wrote: > >This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. > If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning of the .mbox file and then bin/arch --wipe [listname] I thin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Ronny Raschkowan
Mark Sapiro wrote: Ronny Raschkowan wrote: I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing "bin/arch mylist []. It seems f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ronny Raschkowan wrote: > >I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and >saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the >archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing >"bin/arch mylist []. It seems from what you say lat

[Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

2004-07-21 Thread Ronny Raschkowan
Hello! I have a problem, and i still can't get the right answer for it, maybe you could help me. I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i