Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-19 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
DM == Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DM Umbrella lists have always confused me, so it wouldn't DM surprise me if the List- headers are wrong there. (Not that DM I'm responsible for them, but that I have no experience with DM umbrella lists.) FWIW, they've always confused

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Tom Neff
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue patches for prerelease versions and encourage them to do any counter-engineering.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Gregory Leblanc
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote: I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue Well, if mailman did

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is a FAQ entry that wants you to hand edit various spool files, but you can patch 2.0.8 to allow message editing. MM I think the patch will be necessary for mailman 2.1, it MM unfortunately stores the message on disk in a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Dan Mick
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote: I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue Well, if mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Gregory Leblanc
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 19:27, Dan Mick wrote: On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote: I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this hot-buttons, like controlling the List-*

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Neff
It's difficult to edit message bodies with encoded MIME parts, although one can still edit the headers. For plain text messages, I have found the 2.0.8 patch (which simply places headers and body in separate editable textareas) to be usable. It sure would be nice if someone would make a

[Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread Tom Neff
Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one inappropriate word). How can we do this? There is a FAQ entry that wants you to hand edit various spool

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Tom Neff wrote: Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one inappropriate word). How can we do this?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread tneff
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue patches for prerelease versions and encourage them to do any counter-engineering.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread Dan Mick
Which they do you have in mind? No one that I'm aware of on the Mailman team is against the idea of editing messages in the moderation process. I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread tneff
--On Monday, April 15, 2002 4:30 PM -0700 Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No one that I'm aware of on the Mailman team is against the idea of editing messages in the moderation process. That's terrific news! I will issue my patch when 2.1 goes gold.