Re: [Mailman-Users] Server Side Includes

2002-04-15 Thread Timothy Murphy
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Ernesto Gluecksmann wrote: New convert from Majordomo. It wasn't hard to switch once I got around to checking out Mailman's poweress. It's like coming out of the dark ages into the age of enlightment. Well, maybe not so dramatic, but definite

Re: [Mailman-Users] Server Side Includes

2002-04-15 Thread Ben Gertzfield
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 11:30 , Timothy Murphy wrote: While I am an enthusiastic user of mailman, doesn't majordomo still have a well-defined usage, for essentially private lists like committee minutes? This is a genuine question -- am I right in assuming that mailman lists are by

Re: [Mailman-Users] Server Side Includes

2002-04-15 Thread Richard Barrett
At 23:55 15/04/2002 +0900, Ben Gertzfield wrote: On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 11:30 , Timothy Murphy wrote: While I am an enthusiastic user of mailman, doesn't majordomo still have a well-defined usage, for essentially private lists like committee minutes? This is a genuine question -- am I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Server Side Includes

2002-04-15 Thread Ben Gertzfield
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 12:44 , Richard Barrett wrote: Surely, if you are using the built-in pipermail archiver, you can also set a list's archive to private on the Archive Options web GUI admin page. The list archives are then not available through the /pipermail/ URI path element