Sajan Parikh writes:
sendmail is still widely used, and if I were you, I'd just stick with
what works unless you have you a particular need that sendmail wasn't
filling.
+1 with caveat:
Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It
seems likely to me that it won't
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:32:50PM -0700, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 3/26/2014 3:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'd be inclined to chose Postfix over Exim simply because Postfix is
more popular, and new things (e.g. Mailman 3) tend to be implemented
first for Postfix.
FWIW, I found postfix to be
On Mar 27, 2014, at 05:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It
seems likely to me that it won't be hard to get Mailman 3 and
Sendmail to work and play well together -- but nobody has done it yet.
It's certainly the intent of the
--On 27. März 2014 09:22:02 -0400 Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote:
On Mar 27, 2014, at 05:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It
seems likely to me that it won't be hard to get Mailman 3 and
Sendmail to work and play well
On 03/27/14 04:26, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Sajan Parikh writes:
sendmail is still widely used, and if I were you, I'd just stick with
what works unless you have you a particular need that sendmail wasn't
filling.
+1 with caveat:
Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with
On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Adam McGreggor wrote:
I don't know if it's down to popularity or not, but I notice far more
questions on this list concerning Postfix than I do exim.
I suspect it's due to installed base- my very unscientific survey says that
there are far more sendmail and postfix sites
The esteemed Mark Sapiro has said:
On 03/26/2014 02:19 PM, Bruce Harrison wrote:
We are currently running an old mailman instance and am planning to bring
up the newest version of mailman and migrate to it. Current system uses
sendmail. Since I now have a chance to change things,
Thanks to all who replied. Since I've used sendmail and have limited
experience with it, I decided to go with that. Less variables in the mix! :)
Anyway, proceeded with the install and got to make install, which failed with
Permission denied for the mkdir commands.
I'm running from a
On 03/27/2014 02:40 PM, Bruce Harrison wrote:
Anyway, proceeded with the install and got to make install, which failed with
Permission denied for the mkdir commands.
I'm running from a non-root userid who has a membership in the mailman group.
The directory /usr/local/mailman has rws
Gary Algier writes:
On 03/27/14 04:26, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It
seems likely to me that it won't be hard to get Mailman 3 and
Sendmail to work and play well together -- but nobody has done it yet.
I have it
We are currently running an old mailman instance and am planning to bring up
the newest version of mailman and migrate to it. Current system uses sendmail.
Since I now have a chance to change things, what is the best mail server to
run on my mailman box? It will be talking to an exchange
It seems the 3 most popular MTAs are sendmail, Exim, and Postfix. All
do the job well if you're running just a standard install of mailman
without much fuss.
sendmail is still widely used, and if I were you, I'd just stick with
what works unless you have you a particular need that sendmail
On 03/26/2014 02:19 PM, Bruce Harrison wrote:
We are currently running an old mailman instance and am planning to bring up
the newest version of mailman and migrate to it. Current system uses
sendmail. Since I now have a chance to change things, what is the best mail
server to run on my
On 3/26/2014 3:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'd be inclined to chose Postfix over Exim simply because Postfix is
more popular, and new things (e.g. Mailman 3) tend to be implemented
first for Postfix.
FWIW, I found postfix to be generally easier to deal with than the others.
And the config files
14 matches
Mail list logo
