Daevid Vincent wrote:
Well, exim hasn't changed since that date above, and the config hasn't
changed for even longer, so I believe it *is* mailman and not exim:
# ll
total 80
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 26 12:45 .
drwxr-xr-x 77 root root 4096 Sep 13 03:14 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
On 9/12/05 7:58 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wrapper is telling you that it
expects to be executed as group 'mailman', and it looks from what
you've presented that it was in fact built that way. It also seems you
can't change it in your update package.
The wrapper also
-Original Message-
From: John W. Baxter
Has Exim lost its setuid bit (and/or its root ownership) in
the upgrade?
Thanks for the suggestion John, but the perms look correct. Also, other
email works fine (incoming/outgoing). It's only mailman...
daevid ~ # which exim
/usr/sbin/exim
Mark said, Yes, it has the flags, but what is the value of
the ${MAILGID}
parameter? The error message you received says it's
'mailman' and should be
'mail'.
And looking at the log, he seems to be correct:
Sep 12 12:16:19 [Mailman mail-wrapper] Group mismatch error. Mailman
expected
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:33 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John W. Baxter
Has Exim lost its setuid bit (and/or its root ownership) in
the upgrade?
Thanks for the suggestion John, but the perms look correct. Also, other
email works fine
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:05 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
# User and group for Mailman, should match your --with-mail-gid
# switch to Mailman's configure script.
# Value is normally mailman
MM_UID=mailman
MM_GID=mailman
#
# Domains that your lists are in - colon separated list
From: John W. Baxter
daevid ~ # which exim
/usr/sbin/exim
daevid ~ # ll /usr/sbin/exim
-rws--x--x 1 root root 830012 Jul 7 00:57 /usr/sbin/exim
I doubt it can just be mailman.
Well, exim hasn't changed since that date above, and the config hasn't
changed for even longer, so I
Mailman was working, then a (Gentoo) 'emerge -Davu system' update happened
the other day and looks like it broke mailman.
daevid portage-logs # ll *mailman*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 62662 Sep 7 11:34 3485-mailman-2.1.5-r4.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1105 Sep 7 11:34 3486-mailman-2.1.5-r4.log
Yes, it has the flags, but what is the value of the ${MAILGID}
parameter? The error message you received says it's 'mailman' and
should be 'mail'.
Your original post says:
daevid portage-logs # ll /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman
-rwxr-sr-x 1 mailman mailman 7768 Sep 7 11:34
Mark said, Yes, it has the flags, but what is the value of the ${MAILGID}
parameter? The error message you received says it's 'mailman' and should be
'mail'.
And looking at the log, he seems to be correct:
Sep 12 12:16:19 [Mailman mail-wrapper] Group mismatch error. Mailman
expected the
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Mark said, Yes, it has the flags, but what is the value of the ${MAILGID}
parameter? The error message you received says it's 'mailman' and should be
'mail'.
And looking at the log, he seems to be correct:
Sep 12 12:16:19 [Mailman mail-wrapper] Group mismatch error.
11 matches
Mail list logo
