Re: [Mailman-Users] separate web server

2002-02-08 Thread Richard Barrett
At 15:13 08/02/2002 +0800, you wrote: Hi All, I have two servers that work as http and mail, I already have mailman already working on my mail server and right now its also running apache. How am I going to reconfigure my mailman to run on a different web server and mail server? I have read

[Mailman-Users] Log Files

2002-02-08 Thread Joe Mizzi
How can i suppress Alert messages from log files? My logs are getting waaay to big because of an error i know about

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML formatting in digests

2002-02-08 Thread marina
At 12:32 AM -0500 8/2/02 [dmy], you wrote about [Subject] Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML formatting in digests: I think this may have something to do with HTML posts to the lists. I've heard filtering for this will be an option in 2.1. In the interim, www.exim.org (the MTA I'm using w/OpenBSD

Re: [Mailman-Users] Log Files

2002-02-08 Thread Jon Carnes
What is the error? Is it a Python error/warning, an MTA warning, or one directly from Mailman? When I've had problems like this - mainly warnings about routines being deprecated - I've either upgraded to remove the deprecated routines, or gone into Python's source code and removed the

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML formatting in digests

2002-02-08 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 11:27, marina wrote: At 12:32 AM -0500 8/2/02 [dmy], you wrote about [Subject] Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML formatting in digests: I think this may have something to do with HTML posts to the lists. I've heard filtering for this will be an option in 2.1. In the interim,

[Mailman-Users] Web only

2002-02-08 Thread Lynn Calvin
At 06:39 AM 2/7/02 -0500, you wrote: Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] What do you think of this idea to keep external people from subscribing? Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:55:20 -0500 Organization: HAHT Commerce Try it, it should work fine. Your users will be stuck using the web, but that's not so

Re: [Mailman-Users] /etc/aliases and new lists?

2002-02-08 Thread Detlef Neubauer
Michael Styer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If so, can anyone explain what I would need to add to /etc/aliases for each list in order to make them function correctly? My MTA ist Postfix. I have added in main.cf , | alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/etc/aliases.mailman | alias_maps =

Re: [Mailman-Users] Announce only list?

2002-02-08 Thread Detlef Neubauer
Molly Cliborne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm new to Mailman and would like to know if it's possible to create read-only announcement type list using this software. Yes. Privacy Options - Must post be approved by an administrator? [ ] No [X] Yes Mit freundlichen Grüßen Detlef Neubauer

Re: [Mailman-Users] Setting up a 'read-only' list

2002-02-08 Thread Detlef Neubauer
Proffitt, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I need to set up an 'announcement' type list I need to guarantee (if this is possible) that *only* the list admin can post Is there a standard way of doing this? I've flagged the list as moderated and restricted access to the admin pages to

[Mailman-Users] Behind a firewall help

2002-02-08 Thread Greg Branch
I can get sendmail to work behind firewall, I can get mailman to work behind firewall, but not them both. It all works fine out from behind it. The part that is not happening behind the firewall is sending the messages to the list members, they are all staying in the qfiles. Any ideas,

[Mailman-Users] digests wouldn'd send

2002-02-08 Thread Jay S Curtis
First time I've ever seen this message.. Anyone know what might cause it? -- Forwarded Message -- From: root (Cron Daemon) To: mailman Traceback (innermost last): File /var/www/mailman/cron/senddigests, line 65, in ? main() File /var/www/mailman/cron/senddigests, line

[Mailman-Users] backing up pending administrative requests

2002-02-08 Thread Mark T. Valites
I finally have a solution to my fried config.db problem. While I could copy the config.dbs relevant files to another machine make it work, I copying them to a new install on the same machine didn't buy me anything. So the solution is basically: foreach list in old install, make a new list

Re: [Mailman-Users] backing up pending administrative requests

2002-02-08 Thread Jon Carnes
Out of the current ~500 or so lists, I have around 6 that have pending administrative requests. I can get info out of a dump of request.db, but I'm not sure what it means, and what will break if I don't treat them differently from the ones without pending requests. Where is the info

[Mailman-Users] having specific email addresses in the To: field

2002-02-08 Thread Jaswinder S. Hayre
Hi guys. Anybody know if any of the future releases will be able to put the actual email address of the recipient in the To: field instead of just having the lists email address. I don't believe this is possible in the current stable version. Jas

[Mailman-Users] removing message headers

2002-02-08 Thread Andrew Watson
No doubt a common newbie question, but is there a way to remove some of the headers from each message sent from my list? I refer to the stuff like this: At 2:33 PM -0500 2/8/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X-No-Archive: yes X-Ack: no Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML formatting in digests

2002-02-08 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:30:56 +1100 marina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not an AOL user, I use Eudora (and have been using it for over 7 years), and I have changed my digest options to MIME, as suggested - but still, I keep getting plain text digests with all the garbage that currently comes

Re: [Mailman-Users] removing message headers

2002-02-08 Thread Jon Carnes
On Friday 08 February 2002 15:05, Andrew Watson wrote: No doubt a common newbie question, but is there a way to remove some of the headers from each message sent from my list? I refer to the stuff like this: At 2:33 PM -0500 2/8/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X-No-Archive: yes X-Ack: no

[Mailman-Users] goodbye_msg problem?

2002-02-08 Thread Charles Sebold
When one of our lists has the following as goodbye_msg, it breaks the unsubscribe message. Some of the headers are inserted _after_ the goodbye message. Any ideas? Running Debian's Mailman 2.0.8 from woody. This is from the list config: goodbye_msg =Goodbye, sorry to see you leave! NOTE: If

Re: [Mailman-Users] What do you think of this idea to keep external people from subscribing?

2002-02-08 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:55:20PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: Try it, it should work fine. Your users will be stuck using the web, but that's not so bad. Just for info, that's what I've done at my company for the last 2.5Y :-) I want them to use the authenticated web interface to be *really*

Re: [Mailman-Users] digests wouldn'd send

2002-02-08 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:07:38PM -0500, Jay S Curtis wrote: First time I've ever seen this message.. Anyone know what might cause it? -- Forwarded Message -- From: root (Cron Daemon) To: mailman Traceback (innermost last): File /var/www/mailman/cron/senddigests,

[Mailman-Users] Enforcing ASCII in a list

2002-02-08 Thread Morgan Fletcher
I'm switching a 1700-person mailing list from majordomo to mailman. I like mailman a lot, so far, so does the list admin. But there's one thing missing: The ability to differentiate between and filter out HTML/RTF messages and MIME attachments. Our list's policy is: no HTML, no attachments. With

Re: [Mailman-Users] Enforcing ASCII in a list

2002-02-08 Thread alex wetmore
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Morgan Fletcher wrote: With majordomo we had long taboo_body and taboo_headers lists containing things like this: /Content-Type: text\/html/ Is there a way with Mailman 2.0.8 to filter out HTML and attachments, per-list? Look at the privacy page (under list admin)

[Mailman-Users] Can't Add Lists After Upgrade

2002-02-08 Thread Larry Hansford
I was running Red Hat 7.0, Postfix, and Mailman 2.0.6, and have been running with that setup since 2.0.6 was released. I upgraded the server to Red Hat 7.2, but did not change anything else. After the upgrade, all of the exists lists continued to work. However, I could no longer add new