On 05/14/2018 06:33 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
- Archive purge requests. We have discussed the same items as on the
list to date. I am looking at doing a simple grep for the relevant
person's details and changing that. The main reason for doing this is
that if we just remove the author's
Guys,
Thanks for all the discussion around this topic. I have been in further
communication with the people working on GDPR with us. Background: I run
Mailman lists for a couple of charities as a voluntary contribution to the
charities, the charities have money that their disposal and we
Grant Taylor asked:
> What does GDPR have to say, if anything, about subscribers having
> their own archives, which will not be redacted in any way?
>
IMHO they would mostly fail under §18 and GDPR wouldn't apply:
> This Regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data by a
> natural
Hi all!
On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 12:33 +, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
[...]
> These are just rough notes:
>
> - Archive purge requests. We have discussed the same items as on the
> list to date. I am looking at doing a simple grep for the relevant
> person's details and changing that. The main
On 05/14/2018 05:02 PM, Ángel wrote:
> Being nitpicky. What about sysadmins subscribed to this list as part of
> their professional activity ? (but otherwise interacting in the same way
> as a hobbyist)
How do hobbyists interact? Enquiring minds want to know.
--
Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/14/2018 04:11 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Seriously, these folks don't know what they imply.
Nope. Politicians (almost) never fully understand what's going on.
And to be honest: If person X fullquotes and the email ends in an archive,
who's fault is it?
Obviously the archive's (or
Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
... lots of good examples ... well done !
I too dont think any complainer should have the right to kill a
thread, just cos he/she wrote something they later wish to retract.
Killing a thread would be gross abuse of all other posters' rights,
& would invite
On 05/14/2018 04:02 PM, Ángel wrote:
IMHO they would mostly fail under §18 and GDPR wouldn't apply:
Okay.
What happens if a subsequent data breach (malware / infection) causes
said individual archives to become public information? }:-)
Of course, if a company was using the mailing list to
On 2018-05-13 at 05:39 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> It would be a much more annoying matter if they claimed the right to
> be deleted from third party posts that quoted and identified them,
> though. If there is a "right to be forgotten" that impinges on
> mailing list archives, that seems
