Hi all,
I've a user send a message with pdf attachments and they ended up as
html links to the web archive. Which is fine except
- content filtering is off,
- scrub attachments is set to no.
I though that was supposed to allow attachments through. I guess I
thought wrong, but what am I missing?
I have two questions about the DKIM/spf munging that mailman does.
First: when it replaces the 'from' with a munged address [replacing the name
with "name via thislist" does it stick the original email address somewhere in
the
message, so if a listmember wanted to reply to the original sender
On 12/12/18 11:35 AM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
> I have two questions about the DKIM/spf munging that mailman does.
>
> First: when it replaces the 'from' with a munged address [replacing the name
> with "name via thislist" does it stick the original email address somewhere
> in the
> message, so
Bernie,
On 12/12/2018 20:35, Bernie Cosell wrote:
> First: when it replaces the 'from' with a munged address [replacing the name
> with "name via thislist" does it stick the original email address somewhere
> in the
> message, (...)
"Reply-To:" field can be set with the original senders email
On 12/12/18 2:32 PM, Christoffer Hansen wrote:
> "Reply-To:" field can be set with the original senders email address.[0]
> (This is configurable by list admins as configuration option out of
> several possible)
>
> Cheers
>
> Christoffer
>
> [0]:
On 12/12/18 1:51 PM, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a user send a message with pdf attachments and they ended up as
> html links to the web archive. Which is fine except
> - content filtering is off,
> - scrub attachments is set to no.
> I though that was supposed to
On 12/12/18 5:53 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If you're asking if a non-digest member is set to 'plain' would
> attachments be scrubbed from posts sent to that member, the answer is
> no. the 'plain' setting affects only the digest format for digest
> members. It has no effect for non-digest members.
On 12/12/18 4:42 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Those settings allow non-plain text attachments to remain as attachments
> in individual messages and MIME format digests sent to list members, but
> they will always be 'scrubbed' from plain text digests and the pipermail
> archive because those things
On 12/12/18 3:30 PM, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> It's a non-digest list (and yes, I get the archives), but here's the
> thought: if a member's set to "plain", would that also trigger the scrub?
The 'plain' member setting only affects the format of the digest the
member receives
