Re: [MlMt] "Tags" column

2020-11-11 Thread Martin S Taylor
On 11 Nov 2020, at 20:32, Bill Cole wrote: MM tags can have a symbol associated with them as a distinct field. See the attached screen grab, showing that the tag '$foo' has been given the symbol '🔣' Thanks! MST ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lis

Re: [MlMt] include contents of one smart mailbox in another

2020-11-11 Thread Shoshanna Green
On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:06, Martin S Taylor wrote: The workaround I use is to define a third smart (dummy) mailbox, C. Then: C is defined to contain everything which meets [set of other conditions] A is defined to contain messages which are in *any* of the mailboxes: B or C. Thanks, Martin! (

Re: [MlMt] Adding rule based on spam headers

2020-11-11 Thread Bill Cole
On 11 Nov 2020, at 9:45, Charlie Clark wrote: Hiya, much as I like MailMate, I find its support for spam detection sub-par. I understand that there is a preference for SpamSieve but many mail servers already have spam filters like Spam Assassin, so why not make more us of them? Even Apple Ma

Re: [MlMt] "Tags" column

2020-11-11 Thread Bill Cole
On 10 Nov 2020, at 11:34, Martin S Taylor wrote: On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:26, Eric Sharakan wrote: When I look at the column headed Tags(🔣) it's always empty. Hi, you add your own emojis via the Tags preferences pane of MailMate. Thanks, but when I look at the column headed Tags(🔣) it's stil

Re: [MlMt] include contents of one smart mailbox in another

2020-11-11 Thread Martin S Taylor
On 11 Nov 2020, at 19:10, Bill Cole wrote: Create mailbox C with all of those other conditions. Create mailbox A which includes all messages in B and all in C, i.e. with B and C as sources and no conditions. That's what I just said! MST ___ mai

Re: [MlMt] include contents of one smart mailbox in another

2020-11-11 Thread Bill Cole
On 10 Nov 2020, at 15:43, Shoshanna Green wrote: Setting B as a source mailbox for A would mean that A's conditions would be applied to messages in B and the messages that meet them would be included in A, but messages in B that do not meet them wouldn't be. What I want is to define A with a n

[MlMt] Adding rule based on spam headers

2020-11-11 Thread Charlie Clark
Hiya, much as I like MailMate, I find its support for spam detection sub-par. I understand that there is a preference for SpamSieve but many mail servers already have spam filters like Spam Assassin, so why not make more us of them? Even Apple Mail does a good job with them. As a result, I'm