Hi,
just for the record, it appears the mailing list software used for this list
was not running properly the past week or so. Sorry about the inconvenience!
(I'll see if I can figure out why this happened.)
--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
On 3 Jun 2021, at 7:08, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> **Note:** This message contains a change to prioritize the List-ID where
> present and non-gibberish. Probably the best approach. Unless someone has
> feedback I'd propose this as the final version. Benny, any chance you'd
> consider making
On 30 May 2021, at 2:07, Joseph P. Hillenburg wrote:
> Holy cow! I agree - this change is fantastic and should become part of the
> regular kit. My only thought it is that it would be nice if it did
> deduplication. For example (see screenshot)
Deduplication is not possible using the title
On 3 Jun 2021, at 7:08, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> **Note:** This message contains a change to prioritize the List-ID where
> present and non-gibberish. Probably the best approach. Unless someone has
> feedback I'd propose this as the final version. Benny, any chance you'd
> consider making
On 4 Jun 2021, at 5:24, Andrew Korty via mailmate wrote:
> Somehow I don’t have the Mailing Lists smart mailbox. I have a number of
> smart mailboxes under Examples, but not that one. I’m wondering which other
> default smart mailboxes I’m missing. Is there an easy way to recreate them?
>
>
Somehow I don’t have the Mailing Lists smart mailbox. I have a number
of smart mailboxes under Examples, but not that one. I’m wondering
which other default smart mailboxes I’m missing. Is there an easy way
to recreate them?
ajk
On 3 Jun 2021, at 1:08, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
**Note:** This
Thank you for this. I also really appreciate your explanation!
V
On 3 Jun 2021, at 1:08, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> **Note:** This message contains a change to prioritize the List-ID where
> present and non-gibberish. Probably the best approach. Unless someone has
> feedback I'd propose this
**Note:** This message contains a change to prioritize the List-ID where
present and non-gibberish. Probably the best approach. Unless someone has
feedback I'd propose this as the final version. Benny, any chance you'd
consider making this the Mailing List submailbox name default format string?
I realize that with this string, vs my original, the actual MailMate list
renames from “MailMate Users” to “MlMt” (due to the blob). May warrant a
reordering of the variable priorities. I’ll post a revision here if that’s the
case. -Ethan
On 2 Jun 2021, at 13:30, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> #
# Better MailMate Mailing List Submailbox Naming
I've revised my previous mailing list submailbox naming format string and the
improved (and documented) code is below. You can just use the Quick
Instructions if wish and ignore the rest, but I’ve documented the way this
works if you want to dig
Glad to hear some positive reports on usefulness!
This has also revealed several duplicates for me. Not as many as in your
screenshot, but several.
I believe that the duplicates are purely down to the lists having different IDs
(so a function of the Mailing List submailbox “for each”
Holy cow! I agree - this change is fantastic and should become part of the
regular kit. My only thought it is that it would be nice if it did
deduplication. For example (see screenshot)
https://www.evernote.com/l/ABorwnw-h6ZOVJrKSK1kAJZXiskSd-Z-72EB/image.png
-JPH
On 29 May 2021, at 18:55,
I haven’t checked really close, but at a glance, this makes a huge difference!
Thank you!
V
> On May 28, 2021, at 12:29 PM, Ethan Schoonover
> wrote:
>
>
> Do your MailMate mailing lists also contain lots of submailboxes named things
> like “15c317f52899487470ba6529” ?
>
> I couldn’t
Do your MailMate mailing lists also contain lots of submailboxes named things
like “15c317f52899487470ba6529” ?
I couldn’t find an existing fix for the issue of the “Mailing Lists” smart
mailbox submailbox names sometimes populating with hard-to-identify strings of
alphanumerics from badly
On 19 May 2019, at 13:15, aisrael wrote:
From time to time I have a long mailing list that exceeds the size of
the window that shows the recipients’ addresses.
This window enlarges to some extent, but only shows 6 lines. What I
find annoying is that it is impossible to scroll through the list,
On 21 May 2019, at 0:31, Eric Sharakan wrote:
Hi, it sounds like you want to expand the size of the recipient frame
in the composer window. You can try something like this, from the
command line:
defaults write com.freron.MailMate
MmComposerMaximumNumberOfRecipientLines -integer 10
I
On 19 May 2019, at 13:31, John Cooper wrote:
aisrael wrote (at 10:12 on 19 May 2019):
From time to time I have a long mailing list that exceeds the size
of the window that shows the recipients’ addresses. This window
enlarges to some extent, but only shows 6 lines. What I find
annoying is
aisrael wrote (at 10:12 on 19 May 2019):
From time to time I have a long mailing list that exceeds the size
of the window that shows the recipients’ addresses. This window
enlarges to some extent, but only shows 6 lines. What I find
annoying is that it is impossible to scroll through the
aisrael wrote (at 4:15 on 19 May 2019):
From time to time I have a long mailing list that exceeds the size of
the window that shows the recipients’ addresses. This window
enlarges to some extent, but only shows 6 lines. What I find annoying
is that it is impossible to scroll through the list,
From time to time I have a long mailing list that exceeds the size of
the window that shows the recipients’ addresses. This window enlarges
to some extent, but only shows 6 lines. What I find annoying is that it
is impossible to scroll through the list, you have to use the up and
down arrows,
Hi everybody,
today I realized that the mailing list server has been down for a week
or so (a couple of users made me aware of this). I just thought I had a
few quiet days, but that was perhaps a bit naive ;-)
It's up and running again now and I'll look into anything requiring my
attention.
21 matches
Mail list logo
