On 27 Jun 2023, at 1:24, Glenn Parker wrote:
> I think the key point is that MailMate was not designed, much less optimized,
> to be a database search engine, because it doesn’t *need* to be one. ...
Everyone's use case differ of course. For me email is my working backlog and
main conversation
On 25 Jun 2023, at 10:59, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Using a classical database with indexes and the mail information MM
recognizes put into columns, should give mostly instant answers.
The validity of this assertion will depend on a lot of factors,
including the size and content of the email
On 2023-06-25 at 10:59:53 UTC-0400 (Sun, 25 Jun 2023 16:59:53 +0200)
Robert M. Münch
is rumored to have said:
[...]
One serious issue with indexing email is that email is highly
divergent in data structure, and while you can do a simple index for
basic standard mail metadata, "full text" and
On 16 Jun 2023, at 17:17, Bill Cole wrote:
> MM uses an indexing mechanism that appears to be custom-designed for the
> specific purpose of searching email. You can see the artifacts of that in
> ~/Library/Application Support/MailMate/Database.noindex/.
That looks much like a file-based
On 16 Jun 2023, at 12:28, aisrael wrote:
> FWIW, I searched a word in 100 000 messages and it took 2 seconds. I use
> release 5937.
It takes about 6s-8s for me and I have about 300.000 emails.
However, such searches utilizing full-text indexing and normal indexing should
really be instant
On 2023-06-16 at 06:26:11 UTC-0400 (Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:26:11 +0200)
Robert M. Münch
is rumored to have said:
> I have the feeling the search is taking considerable longer than in the past.
>
> IMO MM flexible, easy to use search is a key USP.
>
> @Benny: Would be nice to speed things up
FWIW, I searched a word in 100 000 messages and it took 2 seconds. I use
release 5937.
Alain
On 16 Jun 2023, at 12:26, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I have the feeling the search is taking considerable longer than in
the past.
IMO MM flexible, easy to use search is a key USP.
@Benny: Would be
I have the feeling the search is taking considerable longer than in the past.
IMO MM flexible, easy to use search is a key USP.
@Benny: Would be nice to speed things up (again). Not sure how MM does
searching, but using SQLite for full-text indexing, or special indexing should
help a lot.
--
On 3 May 2022, at 17:00, Ben Lee-Cohen wrote:
> I believe that is the case, but I’ve got 32GB of ram and SSD storage on a 3.2
> GHz 6-Core Intel Core i7 — I’m not sure how I can improve the local hardware
> side of things (unless M1 performance is dramatically better, in which case…).
Move old
Ben Lee-Cohen 2022-05-03 15:27 wrote:
> I’ve got ~600k messages across two accounts, and performing a “simple” search
> (e.g. using search bar, typing “mailmate”, hitting enter) takes about ~10-20
> seconds to get results. Is there anything I can do to improve that initial
> time to results
>>> Hi, I’ve got ~600k messages across two accounts, and performing a “simple”
>>> search (e.g. using search bar, typing “mailmate”, hitting enter) takes
>>> about ~10-20 seconds to get results. Is there anything I can do to improve
>>> that initial time to results short of deleting a bunch of
I believe that is the case, but I’ve got 32GB of ram and SSD storage on a 3.2
GHz 6-Core Intel Core i7 — I’m not sure how I can improve the local hardware
side of things (unless M1 performance is dramatically better, in which case…).
On 3 May 2022, at 10:51, Raza Rizvi wrote:
> On 3 May 2022,
On 3 May 2022, at 14:27, Ben Lee-Cohen wrote:
> Hi, I’ve got ~600k messages across two accounts, and performing a “simple”
> search (e.g. using search bar, typing “mailmate”, hitting enter) takes about
> ~10-20 seconds to get results. Is there anything I can do to improve that
> initial time
13 matches
Mail list logo
