Awesome, many thanks.
(and let's see if it works)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
>
> I was away last week [1] so just caught up on the DMARC discussion.
>
> As an experiment I've changed the mailman settings[2] for DMARC'd emails
> to "Munge From"[3]
you know, I think that's one of the highly undesirable unintended
consequences of DMARC ATM - the habit it's forming to dig out messages from
spam. I keep thinking to myself how I need not make a mistake about
something patently spammy or risky when digging out these from spam. so I
spend a lot
I was away last week [1] so just caught up on the DMARC discussion.
As an experiment I've changed the mailman settings[2] for DMARC'd emails
to "Munge From"[3] which should change their from address to the list's.
We'll see how that goes.
Simon.
Mailop co-mod
[1] - at Linux.conf.au , great
Just noticed a very large increase of activity from comcast, it could be
that they have changed naming conventions (PTR) records on their dynamic
space, or that they are not doing egress filtering on network..
Maybe though information on this naming convention, and what it
represents would be
Looks good!
--
Al Iverson - Minneapolis - (312) 275-0130
Simple DNS Tools since 2008: xnnd.com
www.spamresource.com & aliverson.com
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Franck Martin via mailop
wrote:
> Awesome, many thanks.
>
> (and let's see if it works)
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016
It's Not Just You.
It's being actively investigated, and it appears the impact is small...
But rest assured it is most certainly being looked at.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been
Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?