It hasn't.
I'm still trying to bring it to the attention of the responsible parties.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been
Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?
-Original Message-
From: mailop
It's possible that the issue has been corrected already.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:44 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] "Spammer TLDs" and IP addresses without a reverse?
On
On 4/18/16 2:31 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
On Mon Apr 18 12:53:07 2016, Carl Byington wrote:
I agree. But some providers seem to have trouble with the concept of
setting up proper reverse dns for all their outbound servers.
Apr 18 12:23:23 ns1 sendmail[23389]: u3IJNMG3023389: --- 250-ns1.five-
I've shared an item with you:
Daily Insight RepMan 4/18 Weekly Report
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5uXLOoVt66DdDVXaUZ1Q3otRW8/view?usp=sharing=CK6Siv0M=571516f0
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
Hey Team,
Here's your Weekly
On 18 Apr 2016, at 8:28, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Otto J. Makela wrote:
Would we actually miss any real emails if our mail server
started rejecting all emails from .top, .win and .xyz TLDs?
I don't think it's a good idea to
Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Otto J. Makela wrote:
Would we actually miss any real emails if our mail server
started rejecting all emails from .top, .win and .xyz TLDs?
I don't think it's a good idea to reject any TLDs with open registration.
BTW, Alphabet
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Otto J. Makela wrote:
> Would we actually miss any real emails if our mail server
> started rejecting all emails from .top, .win and .xyz TLDs?
I don't think it's a good idea to reject any TLDs with open registration.
BTW, Alphabet is at abc.xyz..
>
On Mon Apr 18 13:41:55 2016, Otto J. Makela wrote:
> Also, what is the current consensus on rejecting messages
> from "bare" IP addresses without a name in DNS?
Hi,
About everybody is dropping mails coming from a reverseless IP.
--
alarig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Would we actually miss any real emails if our mail server
started rejecting all emails from .top, .win and .xyz TLDs?
I'm sure there are also some others you can name :-)
Also, what is the current consensus on rejecting messages
from "bare" IP addresses without a name in DNS?
--
/* * * Otto
